It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr. Ree
If you work at McDonalds, you get free hamburgers, and If you work as a Cop, you get free get out of jail cards.
It's not corruption, but it's just fringe benefits. The perks of the job.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
He was sentenced to 18 months' jail,[ but the term was wholly suspended after his lawyer successfully argued Wilson had downloaded the images by mistake.
Hmmm, initially sentenced to 18 months...Gee, even if he was convicted (which by the wording of the article, he was) that sentence seems super small for such a crime.
So many oddities to this story...
Originally posted by Raist
Actually I have seen less time for people with child porn on their pc. I have also seen less for those who were actively seeking a child on line and were going to meet the “child”.
Originally posted by intrepid
He should have used the Pete Townsend(I think) alibi, "I was doing research." Pfft.
The reason he didn't do time was:
"I am also mindful that as a former police officer, a period of imprisonment would be harsher upon you."
YA THINK???? Walking dead man.
Originally posted by terrylm
it makes me wonder when this goes on if they arnt in some sort of club for
ratbags and rockspiders get busted then bingo let of nearly scot free.
Originally posted by WishI
I believe that childporn should be readily available to those that want it....
why are they not allowed to pleasure themselves to what they love? (more acurately, what their bodies tell them to love.....same for everyone)
Originally posted by WishI
I am sorry for a completely pointless post....
but....... even though effing children is found to be un moral and wrong (and disgusting to those not born with the appreciation), when thought out with facts on life and a childs mentality.
(ok, so... it isnt completely wrong.....but, still..........)
I believe that childporn should be readily available to those that want it....
why are they not allowed to pleasure themselves to what they love? (more acurately, what their bodies tell them to love.....same for everyone)
sucks for them I know..... but really.... it should be allowed... the only problems are that alot of people can't stop with just looking..... and another problem is with the people who make the porn in the first place... if it was legal they would probably have more reason to go out and "make" it......
edit**
though, alowing people to look at porn makes them want the real thing even more...... .....almost the same can be said about not allowing it at all.... ....without ever knowing what it is like... I bet that is a big helping hand for people to go out and experience it themselves.........
WOW! I never thought I'd hear something as ignorant as this being posted here.
But, I guess sick puppies abound everywhere....
[edit on 19-3-2008 by WishI]
Originally posted by Wal-MartWhinks
The subscription is hard to defend, but the giant collection maybe isn't. 8,000 pics at say 50 kB per pic would make about a 400 MB archive. That's stretching it but not impossible.
Another question- where the hell is all this child porn? I've been all over the net and seen some nasty things but never that! Is it on the so-called "darknets"? Is it invitation-only? I didn't really expect to find anything nasty on Google, but a search for "Sunshine Boys" showed the usual links to the movies by that name.
Originally posted by WishI
and to the cool lady above you who may be trashing their own image even talking to me seriously....