It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Double Eights
9/11 was an inside job.
Of course there haven't been any planes crashing into buildings (terrorist attacks, actual planes have hit buildings since 9/11), because the government hasn't issued there to be any.
When was the last time you heard of a suicide bomber blowing themselves up in a starbucks?
When was the last terrorist attack on US soil before 9/11?
The Patriot Act does not stop terrorists if they want to attack, nothing does.
The Patriot Act is a load of bull# used to limit the freedoms of the American people. It does not institute security.
Originally posted by last time here
i suspect it may be false to assume the public is totally blind to whats
going on. notice the election. there is an obvious yearning for change.
the people who resemble the bush doctrine are being weeded out.
ron paul may not win but he has definately helped awaken the public.
Originally posted by mmmeat
Obviously, you have no clue as to what the Patriot Act is, or what it does. Therefore, your comment only displays your ignorance rather than any type of legitimate argument. Please understand what it is you're arguing about before you post about it. If you don't, then I'll just point and laugh at you ... Like I'm doing now.
Your pal,
Meat.
Originally posted by mmmeat
There's not 'strong yearning for change' any more than there's a strong yearning for more brussel sprouts. Because there's no incumbent, the field is a bit more open. That's all.
Originally posted by mmmeat
If Americans were dissatisfied with their system, they'd turn out in greater numbers to change it.
They don't.
Why? Because they're content. The government runs smoothly and transparently enough that they feel comfortable in this great country of ours.
Your pal,
Meat.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Are you Masons under the impression that you speak for the American people? It really seems that way...
Originally posted by mmmeat
There's not 'strong yearning for change' any more than there's a strong yearning for more brussel sprouts.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Originally posted by mmmeat
Obviously, you have no clue as to what the Patriot Act is, or what it does. Therefore, your comment only displays your ignorance rather than any type of legitimate argument. Please understand what it is you're arguing about before you post about it. If you don't, then I'll just point and laugh at you ... Like I'm doing now.
Your pal,
Meat.
How does anything you said constitute valid debate?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by mmmeat
There's not 'strong yearning for change' any more than there's a strong yearning for more brussel sprouts.
If that is the case, why are all the candidates, including the conservative ones, jumping on the Change Bandwagon.
Originally posted by mmmeat
I truly fear that any of the democrats (McCain, Clinton, Obama, the slightly more male version of Clinton: Edwards) will bring change to America. We'll go from having a robust economy to having one that involves nothing but change (quarters, dimes, nickles and pennies).
Originally posted by Masonic Light
However, we are only 2 votes.
Originally posted by last time here
"robust economy"??? boy, are you jaded. you, o'reilly, hannity,
limbaugh, carlson and the rest of those talking heads remind me
of patti hearst when she was abducted. after being with the abductors
for a while, she began to think like them. you guys need de-programming
BAD!!!!
Originally posted by harrymudd
When is Ron Paul going to drop out of the Presidential Race????
Originally posted by mmmeat
Because they're all terrified of using the words "border" "enforcement" or "illegal immigrant" in a sentence for fear that it will become a soundbyte.
Originally posted by The Axeman
Originally posted by mmmeat
Because they're all terrified of using the words "border" "enforcement" or "illegal immigrant" in a sentence for fear that it will become a soundbyte.
...except for Ron Paul.
Meat: I have seen a few of your posts around and must admit, I had you figured differently than you are presenting yourself in this thread. I'll leave it at that.
I do have that effect on people. So I'll either apologize for not living up to your standards, or I'll say "see, I told you so" while standing akimbo because I met and exceeded your expectations.
Your pal,
Meat.
Originally posted by mmmeat
I will say that I am in complete agreement with his stand on illegal immigration and immigration reform. The thing is, though, that as soon as he heads off his talking points he gets the Crazy Eye going and - quite frankly - he scares me. I would no more want him representing the U.S. than I would want Hillary and her silly wagging finger being the leaders of the free world.