It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
WEDNESDAY, Jan. 9 (HealthDay News) -- It may be possible to predict who will develop psychotic illnesses, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, very early in the disease process, a new study says.
#2 snippet: Results The risk of conversion to psychosis was 35%, with a decelerating rate of transition during the 21/2-year follow-up. Five features assessed at baseline contributed uniquely to the prediction of psychosis: a genetic risk for schizophrenia with recent deterioration in functioning, higher levels of unusual thought content, higher levels of suspicion/paranoia, greater social impairment, and a history of substance abuse. Prediction algorithms combining 2 or 3 of these variables resulted in dramatic increases in positive predictive power (ie, 68%-80%) compared with the prodromal criteria alone.
Higher levels of unusual thought content
Originally posted by interestedalways
The last time I heard of criteria for potential psychopaths it was
1. Killing or harming animals
2. Arson
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Those who used to be called psychopaths are now referred to as people with Anti-Social Personality Disorder.
Originally posted by interestedalways
It just doens't seem necessary to label groups of people because of similar behaviors with all this negativity attached to it. I don't like my websurfing habits attached to mental illness that is a given.
Originally posted by Nyorai
Originally posted by Xtrozero
I found this rather entertaining in can you just imagine a person who is paranoid and some people want to put a chip under their skin, and want them to be watched 24/7, and other actions that would all feed their paranoia?
Originally posted by interestedalways
Higher levels of unusual thought content
That is really a stretch.
How do you really nail that one. Higher than what? Asking for the remote control?
Originally posted by deezee
Actually it's not really a stretch. It's just one of the common traits seen in such people.
Besides, once you personally know such people and notice these traits yourself, it becomes very easy identifying them in others.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I would disagree. It is a stretch when you consider that in order for a diagnosis to happen, the clinician(etc) needs to have a valid idea of what is a usual thought process for the individual.
.
.
This article really begs the question...
What is 'Different Behaviour?'
Originally posted by MemoryShock
A person who was raised on ATS material from birth will have an 'unusual' thought process to a psychologist/psychiatrist whose main stimulii are science journals and mainstream media.