It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by NewWorldOver
Thanks for the taking the time to reply to me, New World Over. There is no doubt in my mind that there is more to the attacks than what we have been told. I admit this field is not my area of expertise so I took the time to read up on your idea concerning the CIA's ties to Al-Qaeda. It seems there was some connection in the past but as for what remains of the connection now I am uncertain.
I like to take all things into consideration before coming to a logical conclusion and never rule anything out but instead review the evidence to see what it reveals. Having an open mind doesn't mean believing everything that comes along so this issue will remain up in the air for now regarding my personal beliefs of the attack. It is an interesting theory that will have to remain just that for the time being- a theory.
Thanks for your input but in my honest opinion, more facts will have to come to light before I accept the fact that the CIA was ultimately responsible for 9-11 (an idea that currently sounds far fetched to me).
Can you provide us with the names of the eye witnesses who saw bombs being place in the WTC?
Originally posted by eyewitness86One poster actually believes that the ' calls ' from alleged cells phones on Flt. 93 were evidence that the Official Lie had some validity
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
reply to post by NewWorldOver
Seriously, your insulting.
Basically, if I may, your argument is one of either I believe what you do, or I am an idiot. Correct?
Sorry about that. I gave you a star for being civil and even-minded. You haven't painted anything as 'crazy' or insulted us for discussing it.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
We don't need skeptics. It's not the least bit insulting to let you know - we do not need you. Not only do we not need you, we are tired of debating the same facts over and over with you.
As I said - the skeptics are emotionally and mentally incapable of discussing the 9/11 truth subject WITHOUT clinging desperately to the official story. That's why I think we should leave the lot of you behind. If you don't believe the 9/11 'conspiracy' then stay out of the message boards, settle down and watch some television.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
We don't need skeptics. It's not the least bit insulting to let you know - we do not need you. Not only do we not need you, we are tired of debating the same facts over and over with you.
Basically, if you may, any argument that the official story is a lie, leads us to be crazy conspiracy theory nuts. Correct?
So why are you still here?
As I said - the skeptics are emotionally and mentally incapable of discussing the 9/11 truth subject WITHOUT clinging desperately to the official story. That's why I think we should leave the lot of you behind. If you don't believe the 9/11 'conspiracy' then stay out of the message boards, settle down and watch some television.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
We don't need skeptics. It's not the least bit insulting to let you know - we do not need you. Not only do we not need you, we are tired of debating the same facts over and over with you.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by NewWorldOver
Cool, I still think I know what "truth movement" you're talking about. Been there before. That being said, you WILL treat other members with courtesy or you can go back to your website and tell them that YOU got banned here as well. Another merit badge.
Consider the T&C which you agreed to when you registered.