It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Okay, then how do you explain the airplane wreckage that was found at the scene? Did they just truck the wreckage in beforehand and wait for the right moment to point it out to the rescue folks?
It is entirely possible to fly the planes into the buildings with little instruction. All you have to do is point your plane at one of the tallest buildings in the world, and hold the nose pointing at it till impact. It would not be difficult for someone to recognize the building and then point a plane at it until it hit, just like at the pentagon.
Why is this such a difficult concept for people to figure out? These targets were huge, easily visible from miles away. With that much run in time, in fairly calm weather, how could they not hit them?
Originally posted by johnlear
The above statement was not made by anyone with any experience flying airplanes. But your opinion is always welcome.
Originally posted by Throbber
And yet there has been no official statement as to the Government's attempts to stop the planes, at least to my knowledge.
Do you have an example of such a statement?
My point here, in case you're wondering, is that no attempt to stop the planes was made even due to the proximity to the WTC and it's distance from it's designated flight path.
You'd think they'd launch some sort of missile from an Aegis carrier stationed off-shore or that there would be some way to react, at the very least.
Originally posted by deltaboy
reply to post by weedwhacker
weedwhacker, in your opinion as a pilot, is it possible to hijack a plane and crash into the Twin Towers? Can a pilot with only a few hundred hours of experience fly a 767 into a stationary object?
It is improbable that the Tenzan Corps achieved such a high success rate when only about 11% of the planes who participated in the operation sunk or damaged American ships.
Do you have any thoughts (or better yet, evidence) for the spectacular light and sound show that was put on?
I don't buy into mass hypnotism on that scale.
Originally posted by ANOK
So what was the 9-11 pilots success rate again? Oh yeah 100% three times.
Originally posted by deltaboy
reply to post by Throbber
What was the FAA rules with hijacking? Automatic shoot down? Jets to intercept and turn away the planes from restricted airspace? Jets shoot down planes immediately without identification?
Originally posted by ANOK
Just another quick point about Kamikaze pilots...
It is improbable that the Tenzan Corps achieved such a high success rate when only about 11% of the planes who participated in the operation sunk or damaged American ships.
Source
11% success rate...Think about that for a minute...
Also not all Kamikaze planes were Zero's, they ran out of them and started using slower training planes which would be even easier to hit a target with.
So what was the 9-11 pilots success rate again? Oh yeah 100% three times.
Originally posted by HolyHell422
reply to post by adjay
...
I don't know... Agreeing to the possibility of other mechanisms for the actual flying of the plane hardly makes up for your belief in the possibility that these complete neophytes could perform the maneuvers these planes had made....
Originally posted by buddhasystem
comparison of 9/11 hijackers and their efficiency with kamikazes is not valid, imho.