It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BUT, that's what professionals do. IF they indeed commandeered those airplanes, they COULD have maneuvered, just not smoothly I'm supposing.
Originally posted by budski
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the japanese planes comparatively slow moving and a LOT more maneuverable?...
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by weedwhacker
BUT, that's what professionals do. IF they indeed commandeered those airplanes, they COULD have maneuvered, just not smoothly I'm supposing.
No. Not even maybe.
And to prove it here is my challenge. I will rent and pay for an hour in a Boeing 757 simulator. You will sit in the left seat. I will line you up on the World Trade Center at 500 mph, 20 miles out. All you have to do, with your 23,000 hours of flight time is to hit the World Trade Center south tower, anywhere around 800 feet up, dead center, with 26 feet of the building remaining intact on either side outboard of where the wingtip hits. You only get one try and it will be videotaped.
Deal?
* Crew: 1
* Length: 9.06 m (29 ft 9 in)
* Wingspan: 12.0 m (39 ft 4 in)
* Height: 3.05 m (10 ft 0 in)
* Wing area: 22.44 m² (241.5 ft²)
* Empty weight: 1,680 kg (3,704 lb)
* Loaded weight: 2,410 kg (5,313 lb)
* Max takeoff weight: kg (lb)
* Powerplant: 1× Nakajima Sakae 12 radial engine, 709 kW (950 hp)
* * Aspect ratio: 6.4
Performance
# Maximum speed: 533 km/h (287 knots, 331 mph) at 4,550 m (14,930 ft)
# Range: 3,105 km (1,675 nm, 1,929 mi)
# Service ceiling: 10,000 m (33,000 ft)
# Rate of climb: 15.7 m/s (3,100 ft/min)
# Wing loading: 107.4 kg/m² (22.0 lb/ft²)
# Power/mass: 294 W/kg (0.18 hp/lb
Originally posted by assassini
While I think flying a plane into a building at those speeds is difficult, it is not impossible. Japanese pilots with little to no flight instruction managed to ram their airplanes into our moving ships quite well in WW2.
[edit on 27-11-2007 by assassini]
Originally posted by budski
This, plus the disparity in size, weight and agility says to me that the comparison between an untrained japanese pilot and a terrorist with no training in a passenger jet is not a valid analogy.
Originally posted by budski
The above post is my point - the difference between the 2 aircraft is huge, and therefore the analogy is not valid.