It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by West Coast
No, I dont think he is more qualified since he was voicing and opinion and not a actual fact ( a biased one at that), he lost alot of credibility with his analogy.
Quite frankly, it made no since and he listed no examples. That might be enough for you to make your mind up about, not me.
Which would be what Mr.Tupelov did, made an arrogant assumption with no details backing up why he thought what he thought. Making Mr.Tupelov come off as a nationalistic, chest thumping, idiot.
about my opinion about Russian technology in cold war...
Who launched the satellite first?, who found the plasma stealth first?, which is better in spy world that time?, which is better? MiG-21 or Phantom?
How is it, the I-2000 is unconventional design, small but effective machine!
Russian scientists are scientists! not idiot!
Actually, the Russians were realists and developed simpler, more easier to repair systems that could keep going in the rather dehabilitating weather conditions they encounter. They relied less on solid state because they realised some of its vulnerabilities.
Originally posted by Eastpolar Commander
Or look at this~!
www.youtube.com...
How is it?
Or you guys need to check out the modern city of moscow!? right kilcoo316!
All great scientific stuff first based on kids idea!
~ Eastpolar Commander ~
!!!
Originally posted by JimmyCarterIsSmarter
There have been a number of soviet aircraft which were maintainence heavy. Mig-29 needed an engine overhaul every 300 hours or so, yet the F-16 could do a few thousand before it needed one. It became so much of a problem that the Germans had to derate there Mig-29s to extent there engine life to an amazing 700 hours (:@@.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
You just lost all credibility you had with me.
Do you really think that the Soviet designers didn't have very good knowledge of the American (and other OTAN) aircraft?
Get a grip, reality is passing you by.
Originally posted by JimmyBlonde
Originally posted by West Coast
Does it get the job done better then anything else out there?
It would seem that you can actually do just as well with a civilian Boeing 737..
Originally posted by Eastpolar Commander
Who launched the satellite first?, who found the plasma stealth first?,
which is better in spy world that time?
which is better? MiG-21 or Phantom?
Russia has her own idea to make their own weapon!
Some of u guys think Russia is second best,
but as a matter of fact that Russia is the best that time!
In result, for example AK-47 claimed as the one of the ten best weapon on earth! so do the MiG-21, and some others...
Originally posted by West Coast
Originally posted by JimmyBlonde
Originally posted by West Coast
Does it get the job done better then anything else out there?
It would seem that you can actually do just as well with a civilian Boeing 737..
Maybe you missed the "stealth" slogan?
The rest of your comment didnt make very much sense im afraid.
Originally posted by West Coast
I said Mr.Tuplev is a chest thumping, nationalistic idiot.
Originally posted by West Coast
Mr.Tuplev compared the US war fighting machine, to a top of the line watch, (Rolex watch) while he basically called what the russians had, as second rate (alarm clock)
Originally posted by West Coast
And yes, the soviets were/are well known for there over bloated egos that often get the best of them. Mr.Tuplev is just that. and over bloated bafoon who is making no sense. It is just his biased opinion.
Originally posted by West Coast
"Get a grip, reality is passing me by?" I didnt agree with you, so reality "must" be passing me by? Get over yourself. Your not making very much sense. I said Mr.Tuplev is a chest thumping, nationalistic idiot. As were/are many russian generals. His analogy is dead in the water, because it makes no sense, other then him calling russian equipment second rate to the american equipment. (Rolex watch>Alarm clock)
Who made the internet? Who put a man on the moon? I could go on... but i dont see you topping that. As for plasma stealth, proof please.
Despite the apparent technical difficulty of designing a plasma stealth device for combat aircraft, there are claims that a system was offered for export by Russia in 1999. In January of 1999, the Russian ITAR-TASS news agency published an interview with Doctor Anatoliy Koroteyev, the director of the Keldysh Research Center (FKA Scientific Research Institute for Thermal Processes), who talked about the plasma stealth device developed by his organization. The claim was particularly interesting in light of the solid scientific reputation of Dr. Koroteyev and the Institute for Thermal Processes, which is one of the top scientific research organizations in the world in the field of fundamental physics. [see "Russian scientists created revolutionary technologies for reducing radar visibility of aircraft", by Nikolay Novichkov, ITAR-TASS, January 20, 1999].
Why did they need to be 'better' in the spy world at that time?
About the phantom. It was not an air superiority fighter like the MiG-21 was designed for. The phantom was designed with a bomber mentality.
Yes, they are content with there "alarm clocks".
Russia was second best, however that isnt even the case today...
And your proof?
In my view, this layout of Shafaq certainly from Russia.
you can see all of new aircraft flew recently just is an improvement out of F-5 Freedom, the situation is really similar to China's J-7 series, although their shape has a little change.
I believe if there is no new concept overseas, there is no such advanced layout would appeared in Iran. I've seen the layout I taken from globalsecurity web has a red star painted on wing, as I had known before this is a concept aliminated by Ruusia.
As far as i know Iran purchased the design for the I-2000 and have built it as the Shafaq
according to online sources it is now ready for flight testing and is a light attack/adv trainer class of aircraft with LO properties (think armed hawk/teja class iirc)
oh and that woman in the picture is one of the lead engineers apparantly
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by West Coast
I said Mr.Tuplev is a chest thumping, nationalistic idiot.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Theres a simple analogy for you.
Originally posted by Eastpolar CommanderProof?
Internet?okay!
man on moon FIRST? what for?
Oh really? US proof it's prophecy about Iraqs WMD!!!!Good optimsm!
How about PAK FA? just wait man!
and people always compare the Phantom with MiG-21! the performance, maintainance cost, and armament! It's still better! F-16 made coz Mig-21!
Even the history why Raptor was made is cause by Su-27!
that's the proof that 27 is better than F-15
so the US should made far-far expansive Raptor!how scary is the "alarm clocks". Anyway Raptor is not combat proof, even F-22 placed in just number 10 of top ten fighter of all time!(Discovery channel version)!
But they're back
about their superiority proofment, 1/3 of the world was communist! Everyone liked Russian weapons and machines!
U never watch TV??? Discovery channel claim that AK-47 is number 2 of ten best weapon on earth! Anyway almost anyone prefer Ak than M4!
Originally posted by kilcoo316
He compared the complexity of the systems, not the performance.
He (Tupolev) knows infinitely more than me, you or anyone else on this forum about aircraft design.
I'll trust his judgment (especially given facts back it up) over yours thank you very much.
You dismissed the comments of one of the greatest aircraft designers of the last century out of hand
Everything about the Soviet designs in comparison to the NATO ones backs up his statement - yet of course you know better.