It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F
Originally posted by CameronFox
I suggest YOU do some research as well. NIST never claimed that steel was melted. NIST actually stated that the collapse was initiated for 3 reasons.
1- Severe damage to a building due to an airliner flying into it
2- Fires
3- The removal of fire proofing material casued my plane impact
Removing any one of the three could possibly result in the building not collapsing. ie: fire alone ..fireproofing surviving impact. etc.
Originally posted by sp00n1
The computer models also modeled estimated damage, as well as a number of very mysterious variables which NIST refuses to disclose, even though it is critical to their 'animation'.
Originally posted by CameronFox
I suggest YOU do some research as well. NIST never claimed that steel was melted. NIST actually stated that the collapse was initiated for 3 reasons.
1- Severe damage to a building due to an airliner flying into it
2- Fires
3- The removal of fire proofing material casued my plane impact
Removing any one of the three could possibly result in the building not collapsing. ie: fire alone ..fireproofing surviving impact. etc.
Originally posted by thematrix
Even if that were so, only where there was fire the steel would have been weakend to the point of loosing loadbearing capability, it doesn't explain at all how the building collapsed as if there was no steel or even concrete in the building at all.
It came down way to fast for that and the entire structure disintegrated and came down in a time period and at a speed CD specialists would be jealous about.
Originally posted by CameronFox
I suggest YOU do some research as well. NIST never claimed that steel was melted. NIST actually stated that the collapse was initiated for 3 reasons.
1- Severe damage to a building due to an airliner flying into it
2- Fires
3- The removal of fire proofing material casued my plane impact
Removing any one of the three could possibly result in the building not collapsing. ie: fire alone ..fireproofing surviving impact. etc.
When you lose structural integrity, it usually happens at the bottom because that's where the load is the greatest, because it's holding up the most weight. Once that goes, the whole building starts accelerating downward at -g with little to stop it.
Originally posted by Reap
I think you'll find that steel loses 2 thirds of its tensile strength at about 500 c more that enough to cause collape also when steel RSJ's heat up they expand pushing out walls and supports
Originally posted by sp00n1
NO, the steel did not get hot enough to loose loadbearing capacity!
Do some research instead assuming you know everything or regurgitating the same debunker statements that are debunked again and again...
The WTC has a safety ratio somewhere in the ballpark of 200:1. Even if it lost half its strength, it still has a 100:1 safety ratio BEFORE the steel is actually loaded to its max capacity.
The WTC had sooooo many redundancies that even it half of the columns and beams were severed it wouldnt matter!
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The steel doesn't have to melt to lose its structural load bearing integrity. The fire was hot enough to weaken the steel, even if it wasn't enough to cause it to become molten.