It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edsinger
In simple terms, my thoughts to your question would be YES.
It is amazing that in Islam the penalty for leaving Islam is death. I know that the other "3" big religions don't carry this burden.
I think the Pope was right but due to the outcry of not pissing off the world, he will backtrack......sadly.
Originally posted by The time lord
If it was not for religion we would be like the Romans, Communists, dicators, monachy rule, slave traders, Facists, cult based societies that are so fragmented each person will declair their own God called Babylonian society.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by The time lord
If it was not for religion we would be like the Romans, Communists, dicators, monachy rule, slave traders, Facists, cult based societies that are so fragmented each person will declair their own God called Babylonian society.
Ummm do you live in the USA? Have you ever read a history book? Have you ever read the Quran? So far, Time Lord, you've made a lot of bold, unsubstanciated statements. Please, show me your sources for the evil that is the Quran.
Also, show me how the US didn't trade slaves. And show me the connection that says dictators aren't religious. Then show me how monarchies aren't religious. Then, show me how religions are different than cults.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Also, show me how the US didn't trade slaves. And show me the connection that says dictators aren't religious. Then show me how monarchies aren't religious. Then, show me how religions are different than cults.
Originally posted by The time lord
Yes I have done done alot of research too and am also refering to how society will cope without a religion in the future and I believe a Democratic Christianity society as probably the best option. I don't really think other religions out side Christainity are that brilliant historically my self and would not live anyother life style.
I know about my subjects I have done alot of reading is down to opinion because its how you experience and see things and how the individual make use of information in the end.
Originally posted by The Time LordWhy do Mulslim countries have swords in their flags? Why do they still behead the infidels, why is it illegal to be from another religion in other Muslim countries. Come on its not like Islam is democracy. Its not like it will want to be if they are under a death sentence to be indipendent from it.
"Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said....She said Muslims had a long history of tolerance,
Not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God's nature.
www.theindiancatholic.com...
I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by professor Theodore Khoury (Muenster) of part of the dialogue carried on -- perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara -- by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both.
[...]
In this lecture I would like to discuss only one point -- itself rather marginal to the dialogue itself -- which, in the context of the issue of "faith and reason," I found interesting and which can serve as the starting point for my reflections on this issue.
In the seventh conversation ("diálesis" -- controversy) edited by professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the jihad (holy war). The emperor must have known that sura 2:256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion." It is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under [threat]. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Koran, concerning holy war.
Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels," he turns to his interlocutor somewhat brusquely with the central question on the relationship between religion and violence in general, in these words: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."
The emperor goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God is not pleased by blood, and not acting reasonably ("syn logo") is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats.... To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death...."
www.theindiancatholic.com...
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Also, show me how the US didn't trade slaves. And show me the connection that says dictators aren't religious. Then show me how monarchies aren't religious. Then, show me how religions are different than cults.
Abolition of slavery was largely due to the christians wishing it to be abolished. Quakers (extremely religous) did not believe in slavery and that viewpoint spread throughout christendom very quickly.
So to many of you on this board who renounce Christianity as evil and all this BS are full of it. The democratic society that took shape in the US was a direct result of religous thought and a yearning for freedom.
I have noticved many who would like to re-write the history books and claim the founding fathers were at least not influenced by religion and were possibly atheists.
I hate to tell you all this but the United States was founded on christian values and thought.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I think that it is clear to any reasonable man that the pope not only did not intend to insult Islam or Mohammed, he actually did neither.