How will they cover this up...

Originally posted by whos_out_there

But I'm not too sure what this has to do with the thread.

Perhaps nothing, just a qoute from my thread that I thought you might have interest in. Though remember back when I said it was not possible to get a clear photo of a true UFO whether its ours or theirs? This is part of it. Ever see a radiator or other heat souce and try to look thru it? The shimmering effect? Same goes here. Unless its parked on the ground with its motor off

Thought that kinda gave a little credibilty to those fuzzy photos you sent me to the other day

But thats okay I'll put it on another post next week.

Nothing towards you zorgon.

None implied, none taken, we all have open minds here right? Well cept that last poster?

Okay now you can't tell me THIS one is off topic. This guy has good credentials

David: There is one piece of footage in which two astronauts are repairing the Hubble space telescope, and we hear them referring to an object which is out in front of them. You then hear all these interjections from Houston Control or Alabama, telling the astronauts not to worry about it — to keep focusing on the mission.

On the film you can see this light going behind them, and later we hear some comment about a camera filter coming off.

It's so typical in these transmissions that you get ridiculous statements coming from NASA that don't make any sense at all and are just thrown out there to confuse the issue. Camera filters are one of the hardest items to unscrew by accident — it doesn't happen. I've used cameras semiprofessionally for over twenty years, and it just never happens.

Hubble Repair Astronauts Spot UFO



[edit on 27-6-2006 by zorgon]

Whos_out_there

Don't know if you have seen this one before, it was just posted in a new thread HERE

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by whos_out_there

But I'm not too sure what this has to do with the thread.

Perhaps nothing, just a qoute from my thread that I thought you might have interest in. Though remember back when I said it was not possible to get a clear photo of a true UFO whether its ours or theirs? This is part of it. Ever see a radiator or other heat souce and try to look thru it? The shimmering effect? Same goes here. Unless its parked on the ground with its motor off

Thought that kinda gave a little credibilty to those fuzzy photos you sent me to the other day

But thats okay I'll put it on another post next week.

well i definitely have those sites saved so i can read in peace when i get home (at work now). thank for the threads. i appreciate it.

Nothing towards you zorgon.

None implied, none taken, we all have open minds here right? Well cept that last poster?

Yea whats up with that last post, i hate when people do that, he didnt even say whos post sucked, or if the whole thread was bad. SOOOOOOOO cheesy _javascript:icon('')

The only thing difficult about writing sometimes is u cant really feel the other persons tone or if there being sarcastic same goes for my own righting. (i guess thats why i try to use the emotion cons. But definitely enjoy the post being put on here. Mostly intelligent comments (MOSTLY lol).

PLEASE Excuse the Quote Screwup. after all this time i still get confused as to where they go when ther are too many quotes. HEHE

[edit on 27-6-2006 by whos_out_there]

No-one seems to want to answer my question about the uncannily manoeuvrable right-angle-turn-capable UFO. Does that mean there's no sensible answer (as I suspect is the case), or have you all just put me on Ignore?

*sniffs dolefully* Oh well, it was just a matter of time anyway.

Originally posted by Astyanax
No-one seems to want to answer my question about the uncannily manoeuvrable right-angle-turn-capable UFO. Does that mean there's no sensible answer (as I suspect is the case), or have you all just put me on Ignore?

*sniffs dolefully* Oh well, it was just a matter of time anyway.

Oh don't cry. Didn't ignore you I made a comment [rather long one] about photo quality and such.

Let me ask you a few questions

Which flight was that and what year....

Why is the picture so fuzzy that you can make out no detail, when all space photography I have seen, even the older 1969 moon shots are at least identifiable and in recent years crystal clear?

Have you looked at it a frame at a time? If so have you noticed the "missle" is all broken apart at the beginning? Looks a lot like a meteor like the other Nasa footage.

Why does the "missle" look like its been "fired" from the spacecraft that the picture is taken from? I was not aware that we had any armed shuttles?

[edit on 28-6-2006 by zorgon]

Originally posted by nwomi
thats a wack post!!!!!!

Actually that is my nemesis from the future attempting to subvert and cover up this thread because it is so revolutionary

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Astyanax
No-one seems to want to answer my question about the uncannily manoeuvrable right-angle-turn-capable UFO. Does that mean there's no sensible answer (as I suspect is the case), or have you all just put me on Ignore?

*sniffs dolefully* Oh well, it was just a matter of time anyway.

Oh don't cry. Didn't ignore you I made a comment [rather long one] about photo quality and such.

Let me ask you a few questions

Which flight was that and what year....

Why is the picture so fuzzy that you can make out no detail, when all space photography I have seen, even the older 1969 moon shots are at least identifiable and in recent years crystal clear?

Have you looked at it a frame at a time? If so have you noticed the "missle" is all broken apart at the beginning? Looks a lot like a meteor like the other Nasa footage.

Why does the "missle" look like its been "fired" from the spacecraft that the picture is taken from? I was not aware that we had any armed shuttles?

[edit on 28-6-2006 by zorgon]

Earlier in this post i stated which nasa mission and I put the link as to where you can see the video that he is talking about. It is definitely cool the way it shoot back towards the stars after it approaches the earth.


HERE IT GOES: www.qtm.net...

Check out the main website they have some pretty cool stuff there too.

main link: www.qtm.net...


[edit on 29-6-2006 by whos_out_there]

Originally posted by zorgon
Didn't ignore you I made a comment [rather long one] about photo quality and such.

No! That was the other guy! I'm so insignificant you didn't even recognize me!

*spins round and stumbles away, weeping profusely*

Originally posted by Astyanax
No! That was the other guy! I'm so insignificant you didn't even recognize me!

*spins round and stumbles away, weeping profusely*

Your right, I did not directly address you with that, Sorry

But my question still stands, and that is directed at you


Now if you haven't seen this one already, this is a convincing picture, taken by the SOHO satellite a million miles out from earth

PICTURE


Now as to that other one...

1] The "missle" looks just like those other streaking meteors in other Nasa footage. Look at a frame at a time... its broken up near the beginning. I would guess that the film is running in reverse...

2] Looking at it a frame at a time you will see that the frame JUST BEFORE that spot changes angle, the screen has a white out...

Conclusion... I would say this one was doctored, and poorly at that

Originally posted by sensfan
Or another, probably likely scenario

- There is no intelligent life visiting this planet so there is nothing to cover up.

Actually, according to modern math thats the unlikely scenario.

Originally posted by ravenflt
- There is no intelligent life visiting this planet so there is nothing to cover up.

Well I have yet to find intelligent life here on earth, so there better be some out there...

Oh wait! Sorry forgot the dolphins