It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I guess the reason people were upset with jsobecky's comments is that genetics is the foundation for "race" and by claiming that she has bad genetics, jso might be saying something indirectly about people who are black. Only he knows what he meant though.
All in all, I still think that the capitol officer SHOULD have known who she was, but as far as I know there is no direct evidence for that assumption.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Yea, well, racism does exist in America.
I guess the reason people were upset with jsobecky's comments is that genetics is the foundation for "race" and by claiming that she has bad genetics, jso might be saying something indirectly about people who are black.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I just wonder why they immediately made the race connection. Instead of age, sex, religion, or anything else.
Originally posted by jsobecky
And so many were so quick to support that connection.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I've never put forward a racist argument here before.
Originally posted by jsobecky
That tells me a lot about those who wanted to make it a racist comment.
Originally posted by subz
Originally posted by jsobecky
I just wonder why they immediately made the race connection. Instead of age, sex, religion, or anything else.
Err genetics has nothing to do with age or religion. Genetics has a bearing on sex and race, so which was it? Given that I asked you three times to explain EXACTLY what you meant, and you refused to answer, what are we meant to assume?
It's your fault you typed that remark, its your fault you didnt clarify what you meant and its your fault there is no rationalization of that blatantly racist insult.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Ahhh! The beauty of the Grand Jury system. It can let a prosecutor bury a case that has political ramifications without any chance of the fallout ruining the prosecutor's career. It is called political expediency. Somewhere down the line something nice will happen to the cop who was assulted because he played along with the game.
posted by subz
A grand jury declined to indict Rep. Cynthia McKinney over an altercation she had with a Capitol Police officer. McKinney admitted striking the police officer when he grabbed her in a House office building. The officer claimed not to have recognized McKinney and wanted her to pass through the metal detectors at the door. McKinney claims she is being harassed by Capitol police over her political stances and that she should be recognized after serving for many years as Representative of Georgia.
W-DC A grand jury declined to indict Rep. Cynthia McKinney in connection with a confrontation in which she admitted hitting a police officer who tried to stop her from entering the House office building. The grand jury considered the case after the March 29 incident, which has led to much discussion on Capitol Hill about race and the conduct of lawmakers and the officers who protect them. "We respect the decision of the grand jury in this difficult matter" said U.S. Attorney Kenneth Wainstein.
[Edited by Don W]
Thank God the opponents of Cynthia McKinney didn't get their chance to indict her for this altercation. Just look at the photo used in that article for crying out loud. They are trying to make her look like a wild woman, why? Whats their agenda? Who told them to use that photo?
I don't believe there are many honest politicians left any more . . I would say Cynthia McKinney . . decent people left. All I say is people like her are what is needed in today's World. With more politicians like her we could have a chance of making a just society.
[Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by jsobecky
I didn't refuse, subz, I was just ignoring your blatant attempt at trolling.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Once again, this is your interpretation, and attempt to start an argument.
I don't know why you continue to harangue me, instead of debating McKinney, subz. I didn't think that behavior was encouraged here.
Originally posted by donwhite
First, the prosecutor is lying through his teeth. He brought the case and wanted desperately to have the Grand Jury indict her. That would have been a 5 star on his curriculum vitae. Don’t forget he is a GOP appointee looking to get into a high priced law firm after doing his obligational tour of duty in the trenches.
Wainstein began work as a prosecutor in 1989 with the U.S. attorney's office in New York. He moved to the prosecutor's office in Washington in 1992.
He steadily rose through the ranks of the Washington office, especially during Lewis's tenure, when he handled several well-publicized cases, including the successful prosecution of Carl D. Cooper for three slayings at a Georgetown Starbucks coffeehouse in 1997.
While prosecuting a case in 1996, a murder defendant stabbed him in the hand while lunging at a government witness.
In August 2001, Wainstein became the Justice Department's director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys.
This year, as interim U.S. attorney, he helped try a case in D.C. Superior Court, winning a conviction of a man accused of assault with intent to kill.
D.C. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey said last night that Wainstein's experience as a prosecutor and top FBI official gives him a useful perspective for working with law enforcement officials.
McKinney probe enters 3rd month: Police unions criticize U.S. attorney
"Right from the start this U.S. attorney has handled this case differently from every other case," said Chuck Canterbury, national president of the Fraternal Order of Police. "And it's because she is a sitting congresswoman..."
...What most angers the police about the McKinney case is that it involves an assault — no matter how minor — of a police officer. Police reported that McKinney hit an officer in the chest after he failed to recognize her as a member of Congress and tried to stop her from going around a security checkpoint, something members of Congress and their aides are typically allowed to do.
"It's obviously frustrating for us," said Andy Maybo, head of the Capitol Hill police union. "This sends out the message that it's OK to hit a police officer — and it's not, regardless of who you are..."
In legal terms, McKinney's case "is as simple as you can get," said George Washington University legal expert Jonathan Turley. Usually anyone who hits a police officer is immediately arrested on felony charges, police and legal experts said.
In political terms, however, Mc-Kinney's case is far from simple. "It is loaded with emotion, and I think the U.S. attorney is being very, very conservative in how they approach this."
Given the political sensitivity — made all the more delicate by Mc-Kinney's early accusations that she was the victim of racial profiling — legal experts said it's understandable that no decision has been made.
"That would be unusual for a run-of-the-mill case, but this isn't a run-of-the-mill case," said Frank Carter, former head of the public defender service in Washington whose clients included White House intern Monica Lewinsky...
n legal terms, McKinney's case "is as simple as you can get," said George Washington University legal expert Jonathan Turley. Usually anyone who hits a police officer is immediately arrested on felony charges, police and legal experts said.