It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House. BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,''(1) and The New York Times declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.''(2)
Originally posted by ludaChris
Rolling Stone mag says teh 2004 election was stolen. OHHHHHH MYYYYYYY GOOOODDDD, it must be true then eh? Rolling stone is an entertainment magazine, they should stick to that. You werent crying when Al Gore wanted to discount all of the military ballots from overseas in 2000 were you? You want to blame someone for the loss, but you dont look at the fact that less than half of this country voted. Correct me if I'm wrong there.
People use the whole diebold machines excuse in Ohio, when only two counties used the machines in Ohio. But the above article should clear this mess up.
Originally posted by forestlady
If they're willilng to steal the first election, why wouldn't they be stealing the second one in 2004?
Originally posted by dgtempe
I have the creepy feeling that there wont be any "elections" in 2008.
But, that's just me. Gut feeling, intuition, higher light, whatever.
Bush & Co. will have to be dragged out kicking and screaming!
Originally posted by ludaChris
Rolling Stone mag says teh 2004 election was stolen. OHHHHHH MYYYYYYY GOOOODDDD, it must be true then eh?
Originally posted by dgtempe
I have the creepy feeling that there wont be any "elections" in 2008.
But, that's just me. Gut feeling, intuition, higher light, whatever.
Bush & Co. will have to be dragged out kicking and screaming!
GREG PALAST: And ‘08, so what's happening is there is no fix of the system. In other words, just like black folk get bad schools and bad hospitals, they get the bad voting machines, which are going to kill those votes... one of the things I discovered is the Republican Party has something called “caging lists,” which came to our -- you know, ... the way the Yes Men capture material by using false websites, so through a false website we were able to capture Republican Party internal missives, through georgebush.org.
And so, what happened was is that they sent us ... lists of literally tens of thousands of names of voters and addresses. We were wondering what the heck this was. It turns out these were almost all African American voters, who they were prepared to challenge in 2004, and they did, to say that these people shouldn't vote, because their addresses are suspect. And you'll see in the book that in the lists of thousands of black voters that they were challenging over their address were thousands of black soldiers who were sent to Iraq; go to Baghdad, and the Republican Party challenges your vote.
And the next thing that they’re going after is the Hispanic vote. So when we saw 2m votes cast/not counted in 2000, nearly 4 votes cast/not counted in 2004, you're going see that number massively increase in 2008.
Originally posted by Travellar
What still amazes me the most is the number of people who claim Bush keeps stealing elections, yet are unable to themselves accept that perhaps more than half of the country VOTED AGAINST THE OTHER GUY!
Seriously, there were only two canidates with enough steam behind thier campaigns in 2004 to be very strong hopefuls. (to the rest, better luck next time) In the spirit of "Denying Ignorance", I will point out that quite simply, a lot of people did not want to see John Kerry in office. Reasons why and counters to those reasons could (and in fact do) fill a whole number of forums and websites.