It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Some debris encountered air resistance and stayed above the collapse as is seen the above pic.
What you had was essentially a hollow tube filled with floor slabs and an internal core structure.
the towers should've taken at least one minute and thirty seconds to fall
demolition is not causing anything to fall faster than freefall.
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
No that Debris was blown upwards by the explosives placed in the Towers. Watch the videos of the collapse and you can clearly see concrete and steel beams being sent flying UPWARDS.
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
Please don't tell me your denying the existance of the 47 core columns, like the 9/11 commission report does?
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
Source? A physicist in California worked it out to be approx. 55 seconds.
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
Demolition COULD cause something to fall faster than free fall, if the demolition explosives created some sort of vaccuum which pulled down parts of the buildings.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by billybob
wow. you showed me, muaddib.
LOL!
if they were actually 'pressure waves', and not just 'pressurised air'(sorry, if i didn't KNOW there was a distinction between the two), then they could only have been caused by bombs. do a little more research.
................
Let's see if it is true that pressure waves are only caused by "bombs" shall we?.....
Pressure waves occur when an object exerts enough compression or "pressure" against a medium (such as water or air) or another object, this forces air molecules to get closer together, which causes a disturbance which is transmitted through the medium/object.
Now, lets see what some real experts have to say about air pressure waves during the collapse of the towers....
BTW, what they say does corroborate what I am saying, except that these experts don't think the earthquakes caused by the collapse of Tower 2 was the cause of the collapse of tower 1, but rather that the air pressure waves released by the falling debris were the cause of the collapse of the other buildings.
First time that I read this btw, but at least it shows that i know what I am talking about....not like some other people...
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
the towers should've taken at least one minute and thirty seconds to fall
Source? A physicist in California worked it out to be approx. 55 seconds.
demolition is not causing anything to fall faster than freefall.
Demolition COULD cause something to fall faster than free fall, if the demolition explosives created some sort of vaccuum which pulled down parts of the buildings.
Originally posted by billybob
an earthquake is not an air pressure wave. you have no idea what you're talking about.
Originally posted by billybob
once again you have proven a penchant for trying to sound like you understand science by quoting someone else.
Originally posted by billybob
i did well in science. i know the basic principles of it without having to go to a website that has 'real scientists'.
Originally posted by billybob
(imaginary)faster than sound air pressure waves have absolutely nothing to do with the seismic analysis.
Originally posted by billybob
can you show me in the nist report, or the fema report, or the 911 ommission report where they cite the destructive force of these magical speed of sound air pressure waves.
the fact is, you're just making it up.
Damage To Buildings Near World Trade Center Towers Caused By Falling Debris And Air Pressure Wave, Not Ground Shaking, Seismologists Report
Joint Release: American Geophysical Union/Columbia University
Damage to Buildings Near World Trade Center Towers Caused by Falling Debris and Air Pressure Wave, Not Ground Shaking, Seismologists Report
Damage to Buildings Near WTC Caused by Falling Debris and Air Pressure Wave, Columbia Seismologists Report
FEMA did provide some information on the fallout pattern from the tower explosions, as well as a description of the pressure waves that accompanied the collapses, in its report.
In terms of sequence of response, the air blast first impinges the exterior envelope of the building. The pressure wave pushes on the exterior walls and may cause wall failure and window breakage. As the shock wave continues to expand, it enters the structure, pushing both upward on the ceilings and downward on the floors
Originally posted by billybob
and the fact remains that the debris on the outside of the tower cannot fall slower than the material inside the tower which must pass through a steel skyscaper. and yet, the video evidence shows that the destruction wave outpaces the freefalling debris, PERIOD.
Originally posted by billybob
and as aelphaeis_mangarae points out, you can even see steel flying upwards and outwards it some pics.
there were explosives. it's just a matter of time.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Wow, you agree with yourself?......
That's a first.....
Billybob, don't try to blame on me your lack of knowledge of science....
Even after I gave a link from a physics site, which obviously you did not bothered to read, you claimed that "in order for an object to produce pressure waves the object must travel at the speed of sound"....
You killed your argument right there and then...
Here is some more info which destroys your statement, and shows who is ignorant in this topic...
....................
As pressure waves they travel at the speed of sound. Typical speeds are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water and about 5000 m/s in granite. P waves are sometimes called "elastic P waves".
en.wikipedia.org...
So take your own advice and leave it alone billyboy, you obviously don't have any idea of what you are talking about. BTW, i don't intent this as an insult, it is simply the truth.
Originally posted by billybob
here, dibby. from your 'own' site.
shockwave, even!
okay? you see the animated pressure waves? they do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to the structural integrity of the wing. pressure waves in air can only impart as much kinetic energy as the mass/density of air, which, because it's a gas, is NOT MUCH.
The sudden collapse of each tower sent out air pressure waves that spread dust clouds of building materials in all directions for many blocks. The density and pressure of the dust clouds were strong enough to carry light debris and lift or move small vehicles and break windows in adjacent buildings for several blocks around the WTC site.
taking into account damage due to falling debris as well as damage caused by the pressure wave produced by the collapsing towers impacting on the ground. Each of the more than 4,600 windows are included in the model, along with each of the 41 floors and 64 columns.
Exclusions which apply to this policy
...........
Pressure waves caused by aircraft travelling at the speed of sound, or faster.
Originally posted by billybob
i see now that my major lack of understanding was what the hay you are talking about. it's hard to tell sometimes. you somehow believe that sound is causing the collapse to race ahead of freefalling debris.
The sudden collapse of each tower sent out air pressure waves that spread dust clouds of building materials in all directions for many blocks. The density and pressure of the dust clouds were strong enough to carry light debris and lift or move small vehicles and break windows in adjacent buildings for several blocks around the WTC site.
Originally posted by billybob
why don't you remind me of the important 'quantum physics' involved in understanding the collapse.
Originally posted by billybob
................
are you implying that the towers were falling at the speed of a jet in flight? you have no understanding of science.
Originally posted by Muaddib
BSRay, you obviously can't even read, much less understand science, so who should drop the topic is obviously the both of you.
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive and/or hateful manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Muaddib
WTH are you talking about?...
Where did i say that sound is moving the dust clouds or is causing any damage?......
humm, i think i know what you are trying to do now.... Nice try to diverge your obvious lack of understanding of science by now claiming this....
I was talking about P R E S S U R E W A V E S.....pressure waves do T R A V E L at the speed of sound... i never said P-waves are sound...even though there is an interrelation....
Originally posted by billybob
in air, pressure waves ARE sound. it is the EXACT same mechanism. it is a transfer of momentum similiar to the steel balls on a swing desk-top ornament. you seem to feel you can move a concrete block by hitting it with a nerf ball.
Originally posted by billybob
bombs cause violent pressure waves, so pointing out the reports of destruction by pressure waves at the towers points to bombs, and not 'overpessure of air'(which actually MOVES THE AIR, unlike pressure waves), caused by displacement by falling debris.
Originally posted by billybob
faster than freefall does not describe the entire collapse, just the portion i circled and measured. do you NOT understand that, for real?