It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“What the U.S. does in the coming few years, particularly with F-35, will ultimately determine the shape of everything else,” Aboulafia wrote in “The Last Great Decade,” a February report about the fighter market. “This market is theirs to lose.”
Originally posted by jetsetter
There is alreay too much invested into the project.
Originally posted by jetsetter
Lol, it will not get cut. Congress will not allow it. There is alreay too much invested into the project.
The government are cancelling these boss choppers and planes recently possibly due to the Iraq crisis so they are quitting these projects to save funds. Why doesnt the government sell off half the aircraft at AMARC to other NATO countries to build up funds?
Originally posted by Harlequin
Originally posted by jetsetter
Lol, it will not get cut. Congress will not allow it. There is alreay too much invested into the project.
2 projects for you to think about:
Comanche
Crusader
both with parts ordered and either in production or ready to go into production;
both cancelled after Billions of dollars were spent (7 billion on the comanche and 11 billion on crusader)
[edit on 19-11-2005 by Harlequin]
Originally posted by COWlan
If any varients are cut, this will be the order:
1. B version (most technical, fewest number ordered)
2. C version (more expensive than the A, very few orders, unlikely to export much)
3. A version (least technical, cheapest, highest order number)
2. Do the Marines really need fighter-bombers...? The Air Force and Navy can provide close-air-support.
Originally posted by ludaChris
The airforce will have an air superiority fighter in the F-22, no need for the F-35. As far as for the marines, this is the perfect plane for them. If i'm not mistaken they are getting the VTOL versiion right?