It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by slank
.
Evolution is the proposition that life forms change over time to create new species.
Darwin observed variant finch species on various isolated islands each with different conditions. Even if you don't believe in Evolution, doesn't this seem like a pretty good 'off the cuff' explanation why each species of finch is unique to each island?
They are all still identifiable as finches.
I think we can all agree that traits are carried down a blood (genetic) line. Children tend to look like their parents or grandparents (ancestors) more than anyone else.
Is it hard to imagine that various kinds of characteristics of a species are better suited to various kinds of environments?
With discrete and unique environments of each island what do you suppose the effect of placing several mating pairs of finches on each of the islands? What might have happened through time?
Is it such a stretch to think that these various breeds of finch were culled/filtered by the unique environment of each island?
Is it necessary for God to have created each and every species and sub-species of finch on the planet for creationism to be true?
Science attempts to find the logical explanation for how and why things happen as they do based on the available evidence.
And yes, science is based on the premise that all occurances in the Universe leave traces. Many people implicitly take this as axiomatic. The most scruptulous of all would also include trying to determine IF all or even most events in the Universe leave traces. But how would you find an event that did not leave traces? Personal experience i suppose.
Perhaps as a defense against the chicanery of other people we as a species had to develop a certain skepticism about events that didn't have confirming evidence.
The Con-artist as well at the Priest both like you to accept what they tell you on faith. It always bothered me that their similarities might run deeper.
There is evidence that many more large species existed than now exist from the fossil record.
Does that mean God wasn't perfect the first creatures he created?
He had to do a little trial and error learning?
Maybe it is just me but creationism sounds silly. Like a sweet candy tale for children. ". . . And then the magician waved his magic wand and created the world!" oooohhh, aawwwwe. 'Tell us more Daddy!'
.
Originally posted by jake1997
Nope.
Its a FAILED theory.
Thats right. Failed.
Evolution is a religion
and should be taught to its members children. Not the public.
All of the fossil evidence and strata supports the bible.
Originally posted by jake1997
The dating methods do not comply with the scientific method. Thats a fact
After that, what is left for evolution to stand on? There is no proof for old age.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Riley et al,
You need to take a serious look at the dating methods used..
Public schools are definitely teaching a religion...humanism. Humanism has been declared to be religious belief in court cases.
To many peoples science is in fact thier religion..it doesnt take much thinking to figure it out.
Ever read much Si Fi...amazing how much religion there is in Si Fi.
Show you how much religion is going on in science...
I have no doubt that the technology has been improved since the hubble telescope was put in orbit..I suspect that the hubble at its maintnence/problem costs it is no longer needed. Think about what this implys. This is real evolution. Lol lol.
Now think about this religion that is going on right in front of you!!!!
Thanks
Orangetom
Originally posted by riley
Evolution is the most plausable scientific theory that adressing the origins of life.
Originally posted by sntx
Originally posted by riley
Evolution is the most plausable scientific theory that adressing the origins of life.
This statement really stood out to me because most of the time I am discussing this subject with someone they get very defensive when I bring up the origins of life. They usually start by telling me that evolution does not attempt to explain the origins of life and then go on to say that abiogenesis is a completely separate issue. So out of curiosity, how does evolution address the origins of life?
Steve
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Thanks for clearing up my point about science being a religion...
Orangetom