It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
It's not settled, because SCOTUS didn't settle it. Until they do, Trump is ineligible to hold office under Section 3. It's only matter of who and how Section 3 in to be enforced.
Ok Sookie...Ok. We'll pretend the 9-0 decision is not reality to appease your delicate sensibilities.
originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
Not sure how reliable this is but ........
Assassin Targeting Trump Allies Is on the Loose, FBI Warns
Newsweek
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
See. If only SCOTUS would have actually said what you said they said, this wouldn't be happening, because it would be settled, and over. But it isn't settled and it isn't over, and won't be settled or over any time soon.
Jamie Raskin plans to revive legislation barring Trump from office via 14th amendment
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
So again, just to be clear...
SCOTUS never ruled or commented on the question of whether the office of the President of the United is, or isn't, an office under the United States according to the 14th Amendment, Section 3.
The CO original case decision now stands by default since the CO Supreme Court decision is now reversed and nullified.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha
The question isn't based on anything.
Does president appear in sec 3 of the 14th amendment?
The answer is no, so how can they make an opinion on something that does not exist?
It DID kick the issue to Congress.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
It's not settled, because SCOTUS didn't settle it. Until they do, Trump is ineligible to hold office under Section 3. It's only matter of who and how Section 3 is to be enforced.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha
They also didn't answer the question of the moon being made of cheese.......
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
See. If only SCOTUS would have actually said what you said they said, this wouldn't be happening, because it would be settled, and over. But it isn't settled and it isn't over, and won't be settled or over any time soon.
Jamie Raskin plans to revive legislation barring Trump from office via 14th amendment
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen
The CO original case decision now stands by default since the CO Supreme Court decision is now reversed and nullified.
It stands as a default to the states. It DID kick the issue to Congress.
The decision did not say that the Office of the President is ineligible for a Section 3 disqualification. So, now Congress with try to act on the SCOTUS ruling. The ball is in Congress' court, so to speak.