It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just Breaking SCOTUS Rules Trump Is Eligible To Be On Colorado Ballot.

page: 17
34
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

A POTUS commissions officers.


This is already settled. Well, not for you apparently.



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

It's not settled, because SCOTUS didn't settle it. Until they do, Trump is ineligible to hold office under Section 3. It's only matter of who and how Section 3 is to be enforced.


edit on 0120242024k14America/Chicago2024-03-05T11:14:01-06:0011am2024-03-05T11:14:01-06:00 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

It's not settled, because SCOTUS didn't settle it. Until they do, Trump is ineligible to hold office under Section 3. It's only matter of who and how Section 3 in to be enforced.




Lol....

TDS is a hell of a drug.


Ok Sookie...Ok. We'll pretend the 9-0 decision is not reality to appease your delicate sensibilities.



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:25 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




Ok Sookie...Ok. We'll pretend the 9-0 decision is not reality to appease your delicate sensibilities.


Are you really going to pretend that the SCOTUS said something it didn't say?

FACT: The SCOTUS ruling did not answer the question of whether or not the President of United States is an office that is eligible for disability under the 14th Amendment, Section 3.

Therefore, the issue isn't closed or over. Far from it, as you will soon see,



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

They also didn't answer the question of the moon being made of cheese.......




posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
Not sure how reliable this is but ........

Assassin Targeting Trump Allies Is on the Loose, FBI Warns

Newsweek


And what do we learn from this? Hmmm

Iranian assassin only targeting Trump People, not Biden or Obama People.

Bingo. 😀



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

See. If only SCOTUS would have actually said what you said they said, this wouldn't be happening, because it would be settled, and over. But it isn't settled and it isn't over, and won't be settled or over any time soon.

Jamie Raskin plans to revive legislation barring Trump from office via 14th amendment


edit on 4220242024k48America/Chicago2024-03-05T11:48:42-06:0011am2024-03-05T11:48:42-06:00 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

See. If only SCOTUS would have actually said what you said they said, this wouldn't be happening, because it would be settled, and over. But it isn't settled and it isn't over, and won't be settled or over any time soon.

Jamie Raskin plans to revive legislation barring Trump from office via 14th amendment



good for him. Since Trump is such a massive threat to democracy, he MUST do this. BTW, can you explain how Trump is a "threat to Democracy"?



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Jamie raskin just recovered from internal cancer. He shouldn't stress himself out so much.



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The CO original case decision now stands by default since the CO Supreme Court decision is now reversed and nullified.😃

Now CO is on par with most of the other States that have already declared Trump didn't commit insurrection. 😀

(even though no State has the authority to determine insurrection) 😎



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

So again, just to be clear...

SCOTUS never ruled or commented on the question of whether the office of the President of the United is, or isn't, an office under the United States according to the 14th Amendment, Section 3.





That's because the question wasn't the issue they ruled on. 😃



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




The CO original case decision now stands by default since the CO Supreme Court decision is now reversed and nullified.


It stands as a default to the states. It DID kick the issue to Congress.

The decision did not say that the Office of the President is ineligible for a Section 3 disqualification. So, now Congress with try to act on the SCOTUS ruling. The ball is in Congress' court, so to speak.

edit on 3820242024k59America/Chicago2024-03-05T11:59:38-06:0011am2024-03-05T11:59:38-06:00 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The question isn't based on anything.


Does president appear in sec 3 of the 14th amendment?

The answer is no, so how can they make an opinion on something that does not exist?


That's one of the issues Democrats wanted "Legislated" from the bench. 🔲



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha




It DID kick the issue to Congress.


How can SCOTUS kick the issue to congress when it plainly states in the 14th amendment that congress is where the issue is to be settled.


Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


It's amazing how you are still propagandized by the MSM as now you and Annee both have stated this exact same talking point.



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

It's not settled, because SCOTUS didn't settle it. Until they do, Trump is ineligible to hold office under Section 3. It's only matter of who and how Section 3 is to be enforced.



Congress will settle it. One way or the other. 😃♾️



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

They also didn't answer the question of the moon being made of cheese.......



Let's petition The Supreme Court to determine if the Moon is made of cheese and what color!! 😎

Start rallies and protesting !!



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

See. If only SCOTUS would have actually said what you said they said, this wouldn't be happening, because it would be settled, and over. But it isn't settled and it isn't over, and won't be settled or over any time soon.

Jamie Raskin plans to revive legislation barring Trump from office via 14th amendment



The Courts can't legislate from the bench like Democrats want. 😬



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen




The CO original case decision now stands by default since the CO Supreme Court decision is now reversed and nullified.


It stands as a default to the states. It DID kick the issue to Congress.

The decision did not say that the Office of the President is ineligible for a Section 3 disqualification. So, now Congress with try to act on the SCOTUS ruling. The ball is in Congress' court, so to speak.


Get your typewriter going!!! Get moving!!! 😀


Disqualification from Public Office Under the 14th Amendment



posted on Mar, 5 2024 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Last Week - Wait for the Supreme Court ruling Trump is toast....
This Week - The SCOTUS is unfair and did not make the correct decision so lets make more laws so Trump cannot be president.

BALANCE THE F"N BUDGET Mr. Raskin and stop your Insurrection.

Donald Trump is not even the President and you people are still freaking out like it is him causing all of the issues in the US.



new topics

top topics



 
34
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join