It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Boomer1947
originally posted by: whyamIhere
These types of events.
Are what starts World Wars.
a reply to: gortex
Doubtful.
Pakistan is a nuclear power.
Iran is not (even if they have 1 or 2 clandestine nuclear devices).
This disagreement is unlikely to spread from between these two.
For one thing, there are probably no nations willing to put their own treasure and blood on the line for either of these two bozos.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
These types of events.
Are what starts World Wars.
a reply to: gortex
originally posted by: rickymouse
I think that there is a very good chance that we are going to be having another world war shortly.
Too many stupid things were done by the current administration in this country in the last five years. Promoting war instead of promoting negotiation and diplomacy is a bad thing for a country like the USA to do. This also applies to NATO.
There is a difference between an enemy and an advosary, maybe someone should tell the Democrats this.
Pak retaliates with airstrikes on alleged Baloch separatist hideouts in Iran
so while not major is an on going issue and Brazil is the beefy one of the south american nations based on land and military power in general
BRASILIA, Nov 29 (Reuters) - Brazil "has intensified defensive actions" along its northern border as it monitors a territorial dispute between its neighbors, Guyana and Venezuela, the country's defense ministry said on Wednesday. "The Ministry of Defense has been monitoring the situation. Defensive actions have been intensified in the northern border region of the country, promoting a greater military presence," it said in a statement.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: watchitburn
Who pulled America out of the deal ?
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: gortex
The deal that was brokered by Obama's appointed Iranian spy?
The deal that didn't stop Iran from enriching uranium anyway?
The deal that involved Obama sending Iran pallets of cash that they likely used to fund terror attacks?
The deal that Iran wasn't adhering to anyway?
originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: watchitburn
I don't know about the others, but I'm often alone in my own car on this website.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: watchitburn
I don't know about the others, but I'm often alone in my own car on this website.
Yes, and all masked up too... do you still only wear two when driving alone?
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: tanstaafl
It was a garbage deal that would have made ZERO difference.
So Iran giving up most of its enriched uranium , dismantling the majority of its centrifuges , filed its reactor's core vessel with concrete and gave open access to inspectors of its nuclear facilities and the facilities that supply it is a "garbage deal" ?
[SNIPPED]