The 2 Improper Impeachments of President Trump Will Soon Be Reversed and Expunged.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: deadlysyn

since you do nothing but parrot Misledia talking points.

For example?

Also, if that drunken teenager decided to shoplift beer, in California there would be no consequences if the total value of beer was under $900.

Trump's impeachments were also of "no consequences".

As far as the second, they tried to impeach a citizen, who was not president at the time....

They DID impeach him a second time, one week before his term expired, while he was still president.

I've read the transcript of the phone call, but it seems you haven't, since you do nothing but parrot Misledia talking points.

But The House of Representatives, not you, are the people who voted to impeach Trump, based on the evidence presented, not to mention the 57, a majority of Senators, who also voting to convict.

sadly, they came up a bit short. And finding out how many feds were involved, it's likely a good thing it didn't go any farther, though, the only win they would have gotten is Trump's inability to run again, and Biden can surely beat Trump again, he got 81 million votes last time. he is so awesome, he should get twice as many this time.

a reply to: network dude

Or do you think that expunging his impeachments will bring him back?

The question is, "Do Luna, MTG and Bobert think that expunging his impeachments will bring him back?" Or, "Do they think it will give them a shot at running as his VP, or getting a nice appointment in his admin, should he retake the White House?" Or maybe, "Do these people think gaslighting the American people, while undermining and mocking the authority of the House of Representatives is worth it?"

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
. . . mocking the authority of the House of Representatives is worth it?"

*insert gif of Pelosi tearing up Trump's speech*

a reply to: DBCowboy

I can't tell if it's willful ignorance, hubris, or old fashioned cluelessness.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

My goodness, you sure have some concern about folks you consider insignificant. But if they are doing a political stunt to curry favor with Trump, should he be elected, it would be the first time something so heinous was done, and I'm sure we will all let people know that we aren't pleased. You can be in charge of making signs.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

Why not fill us all in on 'whats really going on'?

a reply to: Turquosie

QAnon has been made into a big deal by the left. It was a forum. Nothing to believe in. '

And nobody 'worships' anyone. It's fairly common that US POTUS are held up to high esteem.
Nobody said # about worshiping anti-American Obama, yet he still is off limits for criticism. So knock that worship crap off. It's no different. Except conservatives don't tend to throw emotional punches in debate.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Is that a serious question?

They want to set the record straight! Why would anyone want to clear their name.

Its not so much as erasing history, it's a continuing story. When all the parties are dead and gone, history is done with them.

There are PLENTY of us that want history to reflect the crimes committed by the Obama admin against Trump admin. Its important to history. Unless you are on team donk.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

These gals have bigger balls than most the actual men in the House.

Good for them!

I believe that this post is not even a figure of speech.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Only when it's a team donk controlled house! Otherwise, gaslight and undermine away!

We see you!

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So how does this personally Hurt you?

Well, the sad part is that it probably does ……

Though nobody else in the world of adults would admit it.

Or go on and on and on about the horrors …..

Poor thing

Bless her heart

She tried

Maybe she’ll understand someday.

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

These gals have bigger balls than most the actual men in the House.

Good for them!

I believe that this post is not even a figure of speech.

Well, look at MTG and Boebert and Luna ….. and look at queens like Romney, Graham, Kinsinger …..
These women would KO these little beyotches if they ever fought.
It’s an odd condition out there. The GOP has managed to find the most effeminate, undedicated, fekkin’ koontz that can be found. Like it’s a social movement or something.
I want to run for the house just to say this each and every day, while on duty. The sanctions wait for thee, I’m sure.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: DBCowboy


How many federal charges have been brought up again???
Why don't you go do what he is doing and let us know how that works out...brah
Remember you guys are the ones taking rights and banning books......let that sink in

This is a little strong coming from the side that created cancel culture dont you think? You litterally have a culture of demonizing free speech, rewriting books because they have words you dont like or outright banning them for everyone.

This litterally makes you the party of banning books except when its sex stories for kids...

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

These gals have bigger balls than most the actual men in the House.

Good for them!

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

These gals have bigger balls than most the actual men in the House.

Good for them!

I believe that this post is not even a figure of speech.

This coming from the left (aka Tranny Central) is hilarious.

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

I automatically distrust someone that has been told that no books have been banned. NONE

Removed from elementary school libraries, yes.

But they just keep the same grind over and over thinking if they say it enough it will become reality and their outrage and GRIEVANCE will somehow be magically justified.

Its dishonest as hell, and I tend to try to avoid speaking with liars.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Yet you have no problem with the dishonesty of those who state the only books removed are because of pornography.
Which has been proven to be false.

Instead you want to quibble over the word "banned" and "removed".

Not sure how we drifted from Trump to gay porn in elementary school libraries but I do enjoy that the left still foolishly believes that the Steele Dossier is real.

They are cute.

Like flat-earthers.

lol

a reply to: frogs453

No, I do not believe the only books being removed are porn.

I know that YEARS ago, the left removed 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'Huck Finn' because they contained the 'N' word.

And yes, I do wish to quibble over 'banned' and 'removed'. One is a lie and the other is truth.

I don't tolerate lies and liars.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I often forget which thread I'm in. Sorry for off-topic.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: DBCowboy

I often forget which thread I'm in. Sorry for off-topic.

No worries from me, just didn't want to see a bunch of posts removed.

Maybe a thread on "book banning" might be in order.