originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: frogs453
NYT just dropped some new details. The recording was made by Martin as Trump met with aides that were helping Meadows write his memoir. Martin
apparently regularly recorded Trump's interviews during 2021.
During the interview Trump went off on a rant about Milley which eventually led him to talking about a document in his possession that contained
details for an invasion of Iran.
What date does the metadata on any recording say it was taken? Can multiple recordings be edited together? Is there any evidence that is actually
admissible evidence here?
If you need help, I went to law school, worked in government, have been a CEO and have engaged in several complex business litigations that lasted
years and won every thing time (as a business plaintiff).
I can advise as a business exec on the Federal criminal rules of evidence and the probative value of an audio recording of unknown provenance and
unknown integrity.
Absent additional verifiable information, you’re presenting a recording that is not even admissible in a Federal criminal trial as proof of a
criminal act.
Even if the provenance and integrity of the recording can be established — when did it occur? Did it occur after January 20, 2021 at noon? Is Trump
telling the truth and making an admission against interest? Or is he lying or bragging or bigging himself up? Is he claiming he has a classified
document? A document he believes he declassified? A document that was never actually classified but rather an unclassified proposal or brief? Where is
the document? What is the document? Did he actually have it? What did he do with it? When did he do it? What is the underlying criminal statute? Does
it require mens rea?
The list of things no one knows about this is endless compared to the list of things people merely claim to know.
This is why so many “get Trump” psychodramas that play out in corporate press and public lead to nothing tangible.
Because everyone playing isn’t actually engaged in a formal process with a sound evidentiary basis, it’s all DC bar gossip posing as journalistic
revelations.
Maybe this time is different! Maybe.
But what’s presented here doesn’t suggest it is, it suggests the opposite, it’s more of the same leash yanking the get trump audience subjects
itself to over and over for eight years now.
If I was on the other side of this, I’d be quite tired of getting jerked around.
But I’m not on the other side, I’m on the side where there’s actually a difference between formal processes and press nonsense.
Which I’m still batting 1.000 after eight years, and the other side, DNC and GOP, hasn’t even hit a single.
Quite silly.
edit on 31-5-2023 by JohnTitorSociety because: Context