Thanks for posting the linked article(s)! I would not call this a dream come true, but I find it an encouraging sign.
A village of American and Canadian Catholics looking for freedom in a country known for anything but freedoms.
I think you are referring to the
Soviet Union (1922-1991), gone for lo and verily 3 decades now.
Even under the Soviets, the worst times and excesses were due to or under
Stalin (led USSR 1924
till his death in 1953) (an ethnic
Georgian).
Also worth mentioning that the Russians, now that they are not hardcore communist anymore, are hardcore Orthodox.
I personally wouldn't call them "hardcore" Orthodox. I see a culture (ethnic Russian) which was strongly discouraged (between 1922-1991) by the
Soviets from practicing a religion (Russian Orthodox Christianity) that was central to their culture for 1000 years (starting in 988). See
Religion in Russia for a breakdown of numbers. Atheists 13% + Believers-but-Non-Adherents
25.2% + Undeclared 5.5% = 43.7%, which exceeds Russian Orthodox 41.1%.
Note that like many other countries of northern Europe, official Christianity of the State took centuries to filter all the way down to the masses,
This page
Slavic Paganism has notes on the
Continuity of Slavic religion in
Russia up to the 15th Century... which is to say that within a lifetime of Christopher Columbus starting the Spanish craze of Bringing the poor
benighted American natives to the light of Jesus (aka cultural and physical genocide of the Indians), at the other end of Europe, there were slavic
Europeans still running around participating in pagan fertility rituals.
See the 1966 Tarkovsky film
Andrei Rublev, about a very famous ikon painter (Andrei Rublev)
wandering around for commisions to paint religious iconography. At 0:50 Andrei runs across what he calls a "Witch's Sabbath", replete with lots of
insufficiently christianized peasant-villagers running about naked. At 0:55 a partially-clad young lady informs him that "this is the night when
everyone must love" (fertility ritual). The film was meticulously researched, and produced under the Soviets. The actors are naked, but the scene is
tastefully depicted, not tawdry. The director
Andrei Tarkovsky is "Widely considered one of
the greatest and most influential directors in cinema history", a must-watch director for students of cinematography.
And there is no constitution, no protections for any religion other than their own.
This sentence contains two blatant falsehoods. See
Constitution of Russia and
Freedom of religion in Russia.
They have freedom of Religion, and freedom of Conscience.
Adults can choose alternative lifestyles (LGBTQRST++). What they DON'T HAVE, is the
freedom to Proseletyze. You do you, but stop bothering other people by knocking on their doors or marching in the streets waving rainbow flags. While
researching this comment to your post, I do find a lot of complaints about "freedom of religion". If you read into the claims however, I haven't found
any that are not (a) they won't let me knock of strangers' doors to spread my good word, or (b) they wouldn't let us disrupt a
public park to
build a new church, or (c) they won't let us practice our strange cult in
their existing church.
Russia is an extremely ethnically diverse country, with something like 100 languages/ethnicities. It is illegal to foster inter-ethnic or
inter-religious strife: "Get along, or else." The other choice is "mostly peaceful" rioting, looting, burning and inter-racial strife as seen in the
USA. IMHO, Russia is doing a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar better job of keeping the peace. Check out Portland, Oregon and San Francisco, California for
textbook examples of how NOT to do it.
The complaintants most cited to "prove" Russia is mean to religions are the Jehovah's Witnesses. I'm sure most Jehovah's Witnesses are mostly nice
people, but you will have to go to extraordinary lengths to convince me that they are not an annoying joke to the other 99+% of Americans who are
tired of being pestered.
Russia was persecuting and killing religious people just a few decades ago, burning down churches, mosques and temples alike -- all in the name of
communism.
The Communists discouraged religion, true. Please provide specific examples of "burning down churches, mosques, temples". Maybe it happened, but I've
never heard of this. There were a lot of closures, but by no means all. I find reference to priests killed, but under Stalin, every demographic was
being targeted.
Churches and monastaries continued under the Soviets, despite the drop in adherents and priests. Even under the Soviets, and now still, the most
iconic monument of Russia is
Saint Basil's Cathedral in Red Square.
Now they are building many more:
Russia’s
Orthodox Church has Opened 30,000 Churches Over the Last 30 Years, and
Russia Builds 3 New Churches a
Day.
Not churches per se, but (orthodox) relgion: see
The Island (2006). This is a visually
beautiful movie about a man who let himself down during WWII, then washed ashore at a monastary in Russia's (USSR's) far north. He spends the rest of
his life atoning for his sin.
Just to add to the riddle of Soviet Atheism, listen to
RWA: Radio Deza: Soviet Occultism. This
is from "Russian With Attitude". I have yet to catch them in an outright falsehood. In this linked podcast, they discuss (among other things), the
role of Free-Masonry in the Bolshevik Revolution, and the spirituality of the Communist Elite who told the masses to be atheists. This was the first
I've run across this plot-twist to the Soviet tale.
And now these people believe Russia is a beacon of freedom and all things christian.
Again, Russia is not the Soviets. Do your homework,and linearly extrapolate what is going on in the West (North American and Western Europe, +
Australia & New Zealand). Russia is far from perfect. Linearly extrapolate the Russian trends. According to the trend lines, which direction do you
prefer? It's that simple really.
I mean, people can go where they want to, it's their life, their freedoms...
You say this, and I agree. But please do some more homework before you label everyone delusional, who may evaluate differently from you.