Cash/Landrum Texas UFO on Unsolved Mysteries

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: Anomin

Even the witnesses did not consider this to be an ET event. Only their 'minder' John Schuessler seemed to promote it as such (after they'd lost their case against the military). He's also been shown to have blatantly made up some elements of the story.

Just because the witnesses saw "military" helicopters, still doesn't make a lot of sense.
According to these two women the helicopters were heard and appeared after seeing the unknown object. This happened at night out in the quiet region of Texas.
They would've heard the sound of 22 choppers well before stepping out of their car.
A crazy manipulability by these space creatures?

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: mirageman

Their description of a diamond shape is pretty distinctive ….imo

👽

That's some nice down flame throwing arsonists' fantasy air craft.
It surely is useful to burn some trees and the radiation comes as a bonus.
A radiation tree burner is really what our military was experimenting on in the 1970's?
Maybe Roswell crash had something to do with it.

originally posted by: Anomin
a reply to: mirageman
That's some nice down flame throwing arsonists' fantasy air craft.
It surely is useful to burn some trees and the radiation comes as a bonus.
A radiation tree burner is really what our military was experimenting on in the 1970's?
Maybe Roswell crash had something to do with it.

You beat me to it…..sort of….

I mean we have a Flame being thrusted downward as well as Radiation being emitted?

Are they two separate actions or combined?

I don’t know of any flame producing engine that would need to emit radiation as part of its propulsion.

I suppose something like that could be out there…perhaps a black project?

👽

As for the government taking care of these poor folks, no lawyers of any caliber will help you--if the military government of this country decides you are just collateral damage in a government operation, they put the national security tag on. No judge will go against that. The area 51 plaintiffs had Fox News commentator Jonathan Turley, a prominent well know, and well-regarded professor and lawyer, and he lost that case over the national security issue.

Actual earlier interviews……than the UM episode interviews….


👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

the “ufo” just wasn’t simply emitting radiation. It was the target for the radiation. The landrums were just standing too close and also got zapped by the radiation. Again due to some diddling that was going on with the “ufo” flame. It was giving off incidental soft x rays as a reaction to it also getting bombarded by microwaves.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Wait. What!

Now you are going with the things being powered by microwave rectenna, when you used to fight this idea tooth and nail? Best as I could tell because you didn't come up with it first?


Thought you were some sort of "genius"?

Always knew you were full of it.