Mississippi bans gender-affirming health care for trans minors

I'd be interested in when castration of children started being labeled "gender affirming care". Who coined the term? Anyone know?

originally posted by: JAGStorm

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The government should not be between drs and patients.
Period.

I disagree. If allowed the medical community would be giving 10 year olds viagra!
There has to be some sort of checks and balances. Unfortunately the medical community can no longer be trusted. BTW this started long before Covid era. Also unfortunately right now all we have is the government because some parents are too foolish to understand the consequences of some of these actions.

I at one time thought it was OK for younger folks to get this surgery. I read a lot about it and the percentage that highly highly regret it, is staggering. Some even said they were all but coaxed into getting it.
I'll try to find one of the heartwrenching videos.

Some things not talked about

Percentage of these youth that will Detransition
Percentage of reassigned that will require LIFE long medication
Percentage of reassigned that were coaxed or really just going through a phase
Percentage of reassigned that actually have a mental health condition

I completely agree with it.

Even though in the case of the Covid 'vaccines'the Government failed to protect its citizens by distributing unrested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products.

At least in this case they be got it right.

a reply to: Asmodeus3
You know what I mean! Lol

originally posted by: Skyfloating
I'd be interested in when castration of children started being labeled "gender affirming care". Who coined the term? Anyone know?

Same people who came up with the term transphobia...

As if there is a phobia=fear of trans people....

a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

originally posted by: Crackalackin
a reply to: Asmodeus3
You know what I mean! Lol

Yes I do. I completely agree with you.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

It's not relevant in this case as the State has a legal obligation to protect children and vulnerable people from exploitation and harm.

Healthy children are NOT patients.

And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

Can a ten year old girl get breast implants? That's pretty much the kind of stuff we are talking about here. No one cares what you do after your 18.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

It's not relevant in this case as the State has a legal obligation to protect children and vulnerable people from exploitation and harm.

Healthy children are NOT patients.

And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

Really?
You are ok with circumcision?
Those children are healthy?
Is circumcision not mutilation?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

originally posted by: Crackalackin

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

Can a ten year old girl get breast implants? That's pretty much the kind of stuff we are talking about here. No one cares what you do after your 18.

Can a 10 year old sign to get ANY medical procedure?
The more ridiculous you make the circumstances the less seriously I take your posts.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
I'd be interested in when castration of children started being labeled "gender affirming care". Who coined the term? Anyone know?

The left. They always try to put cherry lip gloss on a pig.

The dumbs go all in without hesitation.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

It's not relevant in this case as the State has a legal obligation to protect children and vulnerable people from exploitation and harm.

Healthy children are NOT patients.

And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

Really?
You are ok with circumcision?
Those children are healthy?
Is circumcision not mutilation?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Yes the children are healthy. There is nothing wrong with them. The only issue is that they have been indoctrinated to believe they are a different gender...

No need for left wing and transgender rhetoric. It's already debunked. And it is child mutilations and and not circumcisions.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Crackalackin

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

Can a ten year old girl get breast implants? That's pretty much the kind of stuff we are talking about here. No one cares what you do after your 18.

Can a 10 year old sign to get ANY medical procedure?
The more ridiculous you make the circumstances the less seriously I take your posts.

Having a surgery and remove the male reproductive organ for example it's the kind of stuff promoted by the transgender ideologists and some left wing activists. Why a child has to go through this??

a reply to: Asmodeus3
Circumcising is mutilation.
The fact that you deny such shows your bias and fundamental disingenuousness.

The government should never be between a Dr and patient.
PERIOD.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

It's not relevant in this case as the State has a legal obligation to protect children and vulnerable people from exploitation and harm.

Healthy children are NOT patients.

And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

Really?
You are ok with circumcision?
Those children are healthy?
Is circumcision not mutilation?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

I'm fine with circumcision, that's to help cut down on smegma and infections on your noodle. I don't think that compares to trying to turn a boy into a girl or vice versa. A lot of transers also commit suicide because they're rejected by society or realize they made a mistake and will never be able to go back to the way they were when they were all natural. Those are usually the ones who did it because it was trendy and "brave" at the time and they couldn't get attention the normal way.

According to statista.com:

According to SelectUSA.gov, America has the largest medical device market in the world with a market size of around $156 billion and 40 percent of the global market in 2017.1 UnitedHealthcare Group was the largest health insurance company in the United States by revenue with 286 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, indicating that profits from the medical industry make up a large portion of profits for US companies.

Thanks to the ACA healthcare has become a major player in the US and they're doing everything that can to make it number one on the charts, from pandemics to drug rehab to abortions (and fetal parts sold for six figures each) to gender everything.

When you look at American health statistics compared to the rest of the world it's quite easy to see the goal isn't to improve health, but to destroy it to feed the machine.

15/20 years from now the biggest health crisis will be dealing with all the problems created by mutilating children.

*Trust the plan.*

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Crackalackin

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

Can a ten year old girl get breast implants? That's pretty much the kind of stuff we are talking about here. No one cares what you do after your 18.

Can a 10 year old sign to get ANY medical procedure?
The more ridiculous you make the circumstances the less seriously I take your posts.

Having a surgery and remove the male reproductive organ for example it's the kind of stuff promoted by the transgender ideologists and some left wing activists. Why a child has to go through this??

Parents... Lazy parents who don't have patience for discipline or teaching their kids right from wrong. You wanna be a girl? Fine, whatever, just get out of my hair.

Parents used to put us in sports or on a bike, but that was back when the nuclear family was still a thing and social media was nonexistent.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Circumcising is mutilation.
The fact that you deny such shows your bias and fundamental disingenuousness.

The government should never be between a Dr and patient.
PERIOD.

Healthy children are NOT patients. And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

The State has a legal obligation to protect children from exploitation and harm.

I don't know why it's so difficult to get something so easy and straight forward.

Trying to argue in favour of the trans ideology by bringing up circumcisions shows how desperate your arguments are.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I disagree
The government HAS NO PLACE BETWEEN A DR AND PATIENT.
Period

It's not relevant in this case as the State has a legal obligation to protect children and vulnerable people from exploitation and harm.

Healthy children are NOT patients.

And child mutilations NOT gender affirming surgeries.

Really?
You are ok with circumcision?
Those children are healthy?
Is circumcision not mutilation?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

I'm fine with circumcision, that's to help cut down on smegma and infections on your noodle. I don't think that compares to trying to turn a boy into a girl or vice versa. A lot of transers also commit suicide because they're rejected by society or realize they made a mistake and will never be able to go back to the way they were when they were all natural. Those are usually the ones who did it because it was trendy and "brave" at the time and they couldn't get attention the normal way.

The member is obviously trying to compare circumcisions to removing the male reproductive organ so to support the transgender ideology and practices. He/she has failed completely.

originally posted by: nugget1
According to statista.com:

According to SelectUSA.gov, America has the largest medical device market in the world with a market size of around $156 billion and 40 percent of the global market in 2017.1 UnitedHealthcare Group was the largest health insurance company in the United States by revenue with 286 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, indicating that profits from the medical industry make up a large portion of profits for US companies.

Thanks to the ACA healthcare has become a major player in the US and they're doing everything that can to make it number one on the charts, from pandemics to drug rehab to abortions (and fetal parts sold for six figures each) to gender everything.

When you look at American health statistics compared to the rest of the world it's quite easy to see the goal isn't to improve health, but to destroy it to feed the machine.

15/20 years from now the biggest health crisis will be dealing with all the problems created by mutilating children.

*Trust the plan.*

The only good news that will come out of it is that there won't be any reproduction from these people. I don't mean that in an ugly way, my point here is that natural selection will run its course.