O' looney the cull is well underway

a reply to: UpThenDown
I thought it ironic that you pushed hard against overt sensationalism....
And posted that calamari could be 80' and a picture of squid.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

After reading my post I apologise I should have said squid can be 1” to 80’ I made an error there

But I think you are splitting hairs here

Calamari is squid that is not being disputed......is it?

I have searched for "John O Looney (great name by the way) and calamari in blood" and found the following article, i was told he was being supressed but google still provide a link...huh, anyway

UK Funeral Director John O’Looney Does An Update with Maria Zeee

A young man was recently embalmed by O’Looney and most of his major arteries were blocked with what looked like calamari (octopus)

So now calamari is octopus , I give up

Some trolls will go to any length to detract from a discussion. When they have no reasonable, well considered position from which to argue a point, they will turn to childish tantrums and pointless, meaningless arguments. The bad part is when people who otherwise are reasonable, intelligent individuals allow themselves to be drawn aside into arguments that detract from the topic at hand. I've let myself go there a couple of times, but I'm learning.

This thread is a case in point. The OP was not about squid. No reasonable human being ever thought that people have actual squids in their blood stream. One would have to be either a complete idiot or a desperate troll to completely miss the use of a metaphor (look it up and educate yourself). It is indicative of a very slow mental process or, as I said, desperation. Now, a good part of this thread had been derailed into discussing the difference between calamari, squid and octopus.

The evidence of the formation of synthetic blood clots in the veins and arteries of shot victims is incontrovertible. It is happening. Detracting from the conversation by carrying on, like some fixated autistic child, is really quite sad.

Folks, it's really best to just ignore the trolls. Don't let them drag you down to their level! Most of us are really better than that.


:

a reply to: andy06shake

COVID 19 is not a parasite but a virus, as to evidence that Ivermectin retards or helps treat or prevent COVID 19, well that remains to be established conclusively under laboratory conditions as far as im aware.

The same can be said for this new mRNA with it's redefinition of the term vaccination. Except in Ivermectin's case it has been around for about 6o years with a well know safety profile and methods of action including anti viral properties.

As for this new genetic therapy, got no intention to sign up now with the results I am seeing so far. It is disappointing to see the government medical regulatory bodies remove license from medial professionals talking about other treatments for covid.

a reply to: UpThenDown

a reply to: kwakakev

The same can be said for this new mRNA with it's redefinition of the term vaccination.

You realize that semantic change is an actual thing?

Except in Ivermectin's case it has been around for about 6o years with a well know safety profile and methods of action including anti viral properties.

Ivermectin was discovered in 1975 which happens to be the year i was born, hate to break it to you but im not 60 and neither is Ivermectin. LoL

As for this new genetic therapy, got no intention to sign up now with the results I am seeing so far.

What new "genetic therapy"?

It is disappointing to see the government medical regulatory bodies remove license from medial professionals talking about other treatments for covid.

If its mRNA vaccines you are going on about, nobody forcing you as far as im aware.

Possibly bar your employer who have required their staff to be vaccinated against a multitude of other maladies other than COVID 19 for quite a while now.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
www.britannica.com...

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: andy06shake

COVID 19 is not a parasite but a virus, as to evidence that Ivermectin retards or helps treat or prevent COVID 19, well that remains to be established conclusively under laboratory conditions as far as im aware.

The same can be said for this new mRNA with it's redefinition of the term vaccination. Except in Ivermectin's case it has been around for about 6o years with a well know safety profile and methods of action including anti viral properties.

As for this new genetic therapy, got no intention to sign up now with the results I am seeing so far. It is disappointing to see the government medical regulatory bodies remove license from medial professionals talking about other treatments for covid.

It's a vaccination is simply something that trains your body to fight a virus. How it does that isn't a factor.

Plus, mRNA can't enter the nuclious so it can't change your actual DNA. It's basic science.

I think you'll find the actual Troll here is Mr O' Looney

a reply to: kwakakev

Why ignore it, it just makes my case stronger, Ruby isn't a scientist, shakes so many basic mistakes that I'm inclined to use here as my source of why these stories are fake.

Oh, and on case you were interested she's like Jill Biden, she graduated in Education and Psychology, and her masters are all in paper pushing subjects. She's blatantly not educated in this subject.

In short, she's an administrator, with teaching qualifications. Not scientist.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Randyvine2

Well smasher of a movie, have to give you that.

But anyone that actually believes the premise of the movie "They Live" may find a visit to some sort of mental health professional would not go a miss.

After all entertaining such delusions has got to be debilitating bordering on psychotic far as i can establish.

Again, an example of someone who is either mentally incapable of comprehending things like metaphor and allegory, or is so desperate to hold on to their little perception of their world that they are frightened of anything that challenges their perceived status quo. (One of those two, or they are a paid shill.)

I'll try to explain, though I doubt it'll do any good. You see, the plot of They Live is intended to be allegorical. Here, I'll give you a couple of definitions of the word to help you grasp the concept.

From Merriam-Webster: the expression by means of symbolic fictional figures and actions of truths or generalizations about human existence.

From Wordlink: The representation of abstract ideas or principles by characters, figures, or events in narrative, dramatic, or pictorial form.

So, you see, nobody believes that the plot of They Live is literal. It is an allegory for the controlled, consumption-driven, brainwashed culture in which we live now.

Do you understand now? Isn't that interesting? Maybe you learned something today!

Now maybe we can get back to discussing the topic at hand.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

It's a vaccination is simply something that trains your body to fight a virus.

Since when did a vaccination need so many boosters to remember what is happening? Why are so many still getting sick, passing it on a dying if it really worked?

With so much money wrapped up in this one, it has been a well funded psychological campaign against the population. For now the information dam is still kinda working, but is losing water and cracking up. Eventually the truth is going to come out about the long term implications of the vax.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: AaarghZombies

It's a vaccination is simply something that trains your body to fight a virus.

Since when did a vaccination need so many boosters to remember what is happening? Why are so many still getting sick, passing it on a dying if it really worked?

You could ask exactly the same re the 'flu vaccine.

a reply to: incoserv

yeah I understood from your first post you were calling me a troll

Thanks

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I was about to start typing up a response to your propaganda writtings but then I realised it was you and im wasting my time. Goodbye.

Btw this medical study says the opposite of you www.mdpi.com...

How it trains your body is using the HL2 immune system. HL2 is for large extracellular parasites. They should be training the HL1 immune system… the one that deals with intracellular parasites like viruses, bacteria, cancer.

Training your HL2 immune system for a virus is going to continue to cause unmitigated disease and death.

I should’ve stopped at goodbye.

a reply to: UpThenDown

Or maybe you just have a really hard time grasping the nuances of human communication. If so, I apologize.

a reply to: incoserv

the weather is fine, thanks for asking

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: AaarghZombies

It's a vaccination is simply something that trains your body to fight a virus.

Since when did a vaccination need so many boosters

Since the aim is to keep immunity above 85 percent. Things like flu tend to be seasonal so you boost just before flu season, and it doens't matter if your immunity dips to 30 or 40 percent in the summer. With things like Chickenpox, you're highly unlikely to actually come into contact with it, so it also doesn't matter if your immunity drops to 30 or 40 percent.

Why are so many still getting sick,

For one thing, they're not. At least not as much. A lot of the people who have covid these days are asymptomatic, or have extremely mild symptoms. The sources in my signature show that the rate of serious sickness has dropped dramatically since vaxxing started.

FYI, it's the same with naturally immunity.

passing it

It's a respatory virus, it's possible to pass it on without actually being sick yourself because the virus is simply in your throat or nasal passages. Sources in my signature show that these rates are lower in vaxxed people.

dying

Sources in my signature show that deaths are significantly reduced, and that the average age of someone dying from covid has gone up significantly.

the information dam is still kinda working, but is losing water and cracking up. Eventually the truth is going to come out about the long term implications of the vax.

The only dam is the one against doom porn, academics are free to discuss and publish.

originally posted by: AndyMayhew

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: AaarghZombies

It's a vaccination is simply something that trains your body to fight a virus.

Since when did a vaccination need so many boosters to remember what is happening? Why are so many still getting sick, passing it on a dying if it really worked?

You could ask exactly the same re the 'flu vaccine.

They probably do, and I'd wager they probably thing that it's a conspiracy as well.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: anonentity

And yet he offers absolutely no evidence to back up any of his claims, he does not even offer evidence of how he reached some of his conclusions.

If even a fraction of what he is saying is true then tens if thousands of other people would have seen the same things. For example coroner's offices with a dozen or more staff, grave diggers, crematorium staff. Funeral homes, even caterers would notice that there were more wakes.

The simplest way to debunk this is that these dead people apparently don't have any Internet presence. And neither do their families.

Social media is heavily monitored and the data is mined by everyone from advertising agencies to the CDC.

If there were more significantly more miscarriages everybody up to and including the greeting card industry would know about it.

You'd expect woman's rights groups to be screaming about it. But no, silence.

If the claims of life insurance corporations are up 40% as has been reported, it doesn't represent a noticeable difference in small amounts, only large. Those companies likely don't like having to pay out so it is an issue for them. Otherwise, 40% over average to most people's perspectives isn't much when you figure how many people does the average person know who die in a normal year. Maybe 1 or 2. So 40% over that is only 2 or 3.

Same with miscarriage. And it's a personal tragedy so women are grieving, usually not protesting, but because it does happen, most women wouldn't question it unless it happened repeatedly. The medical system has traditionally minimized women's concerns unless it is dire and there are a lot of groups out there where women are discussing disturbances to their menstrual cycles, some severe and debilitating. Again, it can be dismissed easily by an individual and science alike as women can on occasion have an extreme period or lack of one too. To dismiss any connections and the fact a lot of these women are being censored by media and doctors is telling. Obviously in some, maybe many, cases it may be coincidence but it needs looked into. It's the avoidance of science that is unscientific.