LDNR - free subjects of international law

a reply to: Freeborn


That's what I get for speed reading at work.


Mia culpa.


🙈

a reply to: RussianTroll

When I saw this thread I was 100% sure You made it, who else would? You are repeating Russian propaganda but You have a right to do this. Dont fell under one or the other side of dark force.

Feel free and good health.

a reply to: RussianTroll

Any reasonable person knows that surrounding Russia with missiles, is just a stupid mistake. But who is actually driving this? it cant be Boris or Biden, for obvious reasons. Sanctioning Russian gas supplies is another stupid mistake as the reserves are already very low, winter is still able to throw a surprise punch. Anyone trying to take Russia on in a winter war is stupid, anyone trying during the spring thaw is stupid. So who is actually driving this. Everything I see are political decisions that will further demoralize the citizens of the Western alliance. The fuel prices are already going up, who benefits from stopping Russian oil.? It is the same old gang the Blackrock boys, driven by the no-name shareholders.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Taiwan is completely different. From 1895 to 1945 Taiwan was owned by Japan. Following WWII, stewardship of the island was handed over to Chiang Kai-shek's Republic of China.

China then underwent a civil war that saw the leadership of the Republic of China flee mainland China to Taiwan in 1950, while Mao established the People's Republic of China on the mainland.

The Chinese civil war never ended during WWII, giving Taiwan to the ROC could be seen as picking a side no? Personally I'd say it's a lot more complicated as politics often is but on the surface?

It's very easy to say the west likes to pick and choose the destiny of others.

An earlier note you made is all the nations the west invaded in near history are all sovereign nations, this is correct although they're all definitely modelled in our image, we do pick and choose who gets to define a nation.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

Go look at a map, NATO is on Russia's border, Alaska is about 55 miles from Russia. Estonia and Latvia border Russia. There's Kaliningrad too.

NATO isn't an offensive alliance. Go look at it's makeup and tell me how you would get those 30 nations to agree to an invasion of any country because I'd genuinely love to hear it.

Aggressive multinational endeavours rarely ever work, history is full of them... WWII was the exception. I'm supposed to believe 30 nations have been working towards the goal of taking Moscow for 30+ years, over countless different governments and heads of state's?

Pull the other one.

a reply to: RAY1990

Come on Ray the only thing that matters in NATO is the United States. The whole thing is a genius set up of an alliance to creep up on Russia. Yet the only member that matters is the USA. Their military is like 100 x as powerful as the rest of NATO put together.

Even if you get Britain to turn up with their subs, the Canadians with their couple of tug boats, the Germans who can't even get a reliable military plane to fly around their chancellor and rely on civil airlines as it breaks down constantly along with their Leopard tanks where maybe three are up and running right now, even if this lot turns up to the battle their hardware is totally reliant on USA technicians, manufacturers, programmers, suppliers, designers.

NATO just means USA can sell the weak nations hardware while at the same time getting a foothold in these nations by installing military bases and making them effectively protectorates.

Thirty years of planning to take Moscow? Don't make me laugh of coarse they plan to take Moscow. It's been the aim of the USA for 100 years, Britain's too.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

You do know NATO and its creation did not come from the United States but from the United Kingdom. The US and Russia share a border, with the closest point being barely 2 miles.

NATO is a defensive alliance.
Russia under Putin is a failed state.

a reply to: Xcathdra

You can't surround a nation using cowboys and indian tactics and make a Reservation out of the result

You expect Russia not to bite back by your Reservation tactics?

a reply to: RussianTroll


I disagree with your arguments. But the situation is past the point of that mattering to any degree. France, Germany and the UK let the last eight years waste away. Germany failed to undertake a rearmament program and move towards energy policies that don't involve Russian natural gas. Instead, France and Germany preferred to appease Putin's territorial ambitions.

The next European War is around three years away. After that, Putin's endgame is the employment of military force to restore the Soviet Union's former borders.

The United States were prepared to start WW3 during the Cuban crisis, and there are people who don't understand why Russia would feel threatened if NATO could launch a missile that would hit Moscow in 15 minutes?

a reply to: Nikola014

NATO is not the United States.

Russia lied about not having any missiles in Cuba.

a reply to: alphabetaone

Silly me, I've always viewed NATO as United State's puppet organization.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: alphabetaone

Silly me, I've always viewed NATO as United State's puppet organization.

Glad i could help.

a reply to: xpert11

That decision by Germany just bit them in the ass. Their Energy minister announced that Gazprom has been reducing the flow to Europe and Gazprom has completely emptied out their storage in Germany (almost as if they knew what was going to happen in Ukraine).

So once again Russian reduces energy to Europe in the middle of Winter.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: alphabetaone

Silly me, I've always viewed NATO as United State's puppet organization.

Like russia and the ssr's?

a reply to: RussianTroll

Does Dagestan get the same?

a reply to: Xcathdra

And once again fools pay the price for foolish actions and making their people dependent on Russia.