It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
Zero Hedge is a far-right libertarian financial blog, presenting staff-written articles and aggregating news and opinions from external sources.
I'll wait for other sources.
Tyler Durden -- figures.
originally posted by: network dude
I wonder of anyone will revisit the Seth Rich angle?
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: Annee
I'm not sure what source(s) you would consider 'credible'; will any of these do?
www.washingtontimes.com... b/14/most-democrats-say-hillary-clinton-should-be-inves/
https: //www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2022/02/poll-66-of-democrats-say-hillary-should-be-investigated-for-role-in-russiagate-scandal/
ussanews.com... number-of-democrats-want-hillary-investigated-over-russiagate/
Conversely, you could do your own resource to see if any of the mounting evidence holds up to scrutiny. That is, if the truth is more important than political leanings.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
We just had the Durham report conclude that Hillary's campaign not only fabricated the Russia collusion theory, but went as far as to hire people to hack into Trump's computers.
Now for the shocking part:
Two-Thirds Of Democrats Want Hillary Spying, Fake Russia Charges Investigated; New Poll Finds
A full 66% of Democrats want to see her investigated. You can imagine what the overall numbers look like.
Hillary and her campaign have clearly committed multiple crimes. Plus they can get sued by Trump and anybody else who was damaged by this. If Durham is able to tie the DNC into this**, we might even see RICO action come out of this.
** Who paid for the hackers?
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: Annee
I'll wait for other sources.
It's all in the report - what are your "other sources" waiting for?
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: Annee
I'm not sure what source(s) you would consider 'credible'; will any of these do?
www.washingtontimes.com... b/14/most-democrats-say-hillary-clinton-should-be-inves/
https: //www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2022/02/poll-66-of-democrats-say-hillary-should-be-investigated-for-role-in-russiagate-scandal/
ussanews.com... number-of-democrats-want-hillary-investigated-over-russiagate/
Conversely, you could do your own resource to see if any of the mounting evidence holds up to scrutiny. That is, if the truth is more important than political leanings.