People Who Know This and Freely Choose Covid-19 Vaccination are Equivalent to Cigarette Smokers.

Wednesday, December 8, 2021

-Refresher and an Analogy for Consideration-

1.) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES have obtained legal exemptions from being sued if any Adults or Children have adverse reactions to Covid-19 vaccines that result in medical expenses or disabilities. Also, there will be no reimbursement for lost wages while not working due to Covid-19 vaccine-related medical issues.

PROOF: www.cnbc.com...


2.) CONGRESS and STAFFERS have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate.

PROOF: www.foxnews.com...


3.) WHITE HOUSE STAFF have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate.

PROOF: www.foxnews.com...


Do the above three items, taken together, send a clear signal/message that the Covid-19 "vaccines" are potentially dangerous to the human body over time? In my mind, most definitely!

But unless you show people the above 3 items, they simply dismiss your warnings as paranoid conspiracy-nonsense.

Once you demonstrate how the POWERFUL in America are shying away from the Covid-19 injections, and equate choosing to be injected with these drugs, as being the same as choosing to smoke cigarettes....EYES ARE OPENED.

It may not change a person's belief-system, but they will certainly have these items in the back of their mind, from that point forward.

And, if they ask, "Why would doctors want us to be vaccinated, if the vaccines are risky?", show them how doctors, medical centers, clinics, Rite-Aids, etc.. are paid $40 per injection, with $0 overhead: www.cms.gov...

Covid-19 continuing to gradually fade away, efforts are ramping up across all industries and entities who benefit from the many billions of dollars the Federal Government has made available for promoting, distributing, and injecting the Covid-19 vaccines/boosters.

Dr. Anthony Fauci said this morning on CNN that the time is fast approaching when "FULLY-VACCINATED" will be re-defined to be THREE shots/jabs. On that date, those who have not had a booster will instantly be "Not Fully Vaccinated". Fauci says companies will grant a grace period before firing the newly "not fully vaccinated" employees, however.

-CareWeMust

Being a cigarette smoker, I have to say that I believe moderate tobacco use of a more natural type of tobacco is safer than getting the vaccine. Then again, I think that it is possible that for the majority of people who have low risk of the virus turning covid, getting the immunity from the virus infection is less risk than the risk of the mRNA side effects

But what do I know, I am just a mouse with no medical certificates hanging on my walls. A mouse that can comprehend what I read in medical research articles.

If people want to believe that the vaccine is perfectly safe and effective, it is their right and their life. I will not object, even if it is my own kids, it is their life not mine. If everyone thought that way on both sides, we would have a way better society in America.

a reply to: rickymouse

Thanks for replying, RickyMouse. If you believe the vaccines are safe, despite items #1 #2 and #3 in the Opening Post, that is your right.

a reply to: carewemust

Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.

We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.

Smoke em if ya got em.

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust

Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.

We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.

Smoke em if ya got em.

On the battlefield, soldiers were given a cigarette to ease their pain.

a reply to: carewemust

2.) CONGRESS and STAFFERS have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate. PROOF: www.foxnews.com... 3.) WHITE HOUSE STAFF have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate. PROOF: www.foxnews.com...

I need more of an explanation here .

I read both articles and they are gong in circles there is no explanation as to why these groups have Exempted status .

Does anyone have anymore information to add other than the obvious reasons , being they are powerful and they know the Vaccine is either Bad or BS.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust

Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.

We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.

Smoke em if ya got em.

On the battlefield, soldiers were given a cigarette to ease their pain.

I didn’t know that.

Just like giving the vax to ease the Covid.

History repeating itself.

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust

Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.

We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.

Smoke em if ya got em.

On the battlefield, soldiers were given a cigarette to ease their pain.

I didn’t know that.

Just like giving the vax to ease the Covid.

History repeating itself.

The battlefield cigarettes didn't have filters either!

a reply to: carewemust

I saw a video of a Pfizer exec talking about their immunity to any liability. If you look at the countries that were slow to receive vaccines you’ll see that they were the ones that were reluctant to offer this immunity. The exec said as much.

I wonder if they are using the old or new definition of immunity?

a reply to: carewemust

1. For once you stayed honest and fact driven on this statement.

2. The Sept Mandate only applies to the Executive Branch of which Congress is not a part.

www.usatoday.com...

3 . The WhiteHouse staff article is from July 23 and is no longer applicable . This has been stated multiple times in other threads yet you choose to ignore that fact...

www.factcheck.org...

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Bidens order or edicts are just that. Not law.

As we have separation of powers, his purview is solely within the executive branch. He has no control over the other branches of govt.

Now the vaccine edicts were directed at businesses, which was struck down....again, by the courts.

Everything else pertaining to the white house staff is spot on. They don't practice what they preach etc.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

"Biden’s vaccine requirements were issued in the form of an executive order – directives that apply only to the executive branch. Congress is the legislative branch, and thus, is not subject to the order. "
www.usatoday.com... ry/news/factcheck/2021/09/20/fact-check-biden-cant-mandate-vaccines-congress/8384930002/

a reply to: carewemust
These companies advertise drugs on tv with happy soothing music and happy people while quickly reading off lists of side effects that can easily be worse than symptoms and illnesses they treat, including heart attacks, strokes, comas, suicidal thoughts and even outright death. And they were not even legally required to do that for decades.

The sad truth, most people are just plain stupid, especially the ones who love to brag about being intellectually superior. Regular rational folk tend to dismiss a supposed medicine that advertises there is a slight chance it could kill you . idiots believe its their only chance of reprieve.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Congress and the White House write their own rules.

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust

I saw a video of a Pfizer exec talking about their immunity to any liability. If you look at the countries that were slow to receive vaccines you’ll see that they were the ones that were reluctant to offer this immunity. The exec said as much.

I wonder if they are using the old or new definition of immunity?

Thankyou for supplying that additional important information. The World Health Organization was complaining about the "poorer" countries not receiving vaccines. Maybe they are the ones who would not shield the pharmaceuticals against being sued.

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: carewemust

1. For once you stayed honest and fact driven on this statement.

2. The Sept Mandate only applies to the Executive Branch of which Congress is not a part.

www.usatoday.com...

3 . The WhiteHouse staff article is from July 23 and is no longer applicable . This has been stated multiple times in other threads yet you choose to ignore that fact...

www.factcheck.org...

How deceptive of you.

I'm done being polite.

You are outright lying.

And so is the democrat's factcheck.org.

OSHA is under the executive branch, and democrats attempted to use that fact to extend their illegal mandate to ALL American organizations with 100 or more employees through that same OSHA department.

Democrats also illegally tried to enforce it on medical industry employers with less than 100 employees, illegally claiming that since they accepted Medicare they had to enforce any and all executive branch mandates.

Including a rural mom & pop pharmacy with 4 employees.

The courts did not just stop this blatantly illegal activity being conducted by the democrat party, they outright slammed it as an intentional effort by democrats to violate the the U.S. Constitution.

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

"Biden’s vaccine requirements were issued in the form of an executive order – directives that apply only to the executive branch. Congress is the legislative branch, and thus, is not subject to the order. "
www.usatoday.com... ry/news/factcheck/2021/09/20/fact-check-biden-cant-mandate-vaccines-congress/8384930002/

See my previous post.

Insert Ditto here.

a reply to: carewemust


Did anyone else notice that only 2 senate Democrats voted for stopping the illegal mandates?

And one of them has been publicly mulling a change to the Republican Party.


Please, someone tell me again how unfair it is that I lump all democrats together for ridicule.

Not a single democrat is gonna get away with saying 'but I was a good nazi' when this is over.

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: carewemust

1. For once you stayed honest and fact driven on this statement.

2. The Sept Mandate only applies to the Executive Branch of which Congress is not a part.

www.usatoday.com...

3 . The WhiteHouse staff article is from July 23 and is no longer applicable . This has been stated multiple times in other threads yet you choose to ignore that fact...

www.factcheck.org...

Congress chose to NOT voluntarily enact their own mandate....which they were free to do.

FactCheck.org is (intentionally) wrong most of the time when it comes to partisan issues. They count on the reader not being too bright...and it works.

White House spokesperson Jen Psaki says White House staffers are not being compelled to be vaccinated.

You're free to not believe Jen Psaki. But her statement can't be clearer: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Bidens order or edicts are just that. Not law.

As we have separation of powers, his purview is solely within the executive branch. He has no control over the other branches of govt.

Now the vaccine edicts were directed at businesses, which was struck down....again, by the courts.

Everything else pertaining to the white house staff is spot on. They don't practice what they preach etc.

There are some really young/inexperienced people here who always spout off rules and guidance, as if those rules and guidance are universally adhered to.

Maturity brings common sense into play.

For instance, when the Pharmaceuticals sought immunity from prosecution and lawsuits, every top-level member of the U.S. Government saw that RED FLAG and FOUND A WAY to avoid being vaccinated.

In the government agencies that employ the more "informed" members of society (like spies, lawyers, etc.), more than 25% of them have openly stated they will NOT let themselves or their families be injected with these potential poisons.