It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: tanstaafl
We're not on the gold standard anymore, bud. So the definition of inflation before Nixon ended USD to gold transferability no longer applies....
That's it? That's all you got? "We're not on the gold standard anymore"?
Rotflmao!!!
First, neither the Feducation series at the first link or the article in the WSJ at the second link were written when we were on a gold standard, so you're point is... insane (bud)...
Second, whether a country is on a gold standard or not is irrelevant to inflation. Inflation is caused by loose monetary policy that allows currency to be injected into the market at will.
You probably don't even understand the basics of how our current monetary system even works. I'll give you a hint: it is called a debt/usury based fiat system.
The USD is directly tied to the strength of economy and ability to pay back debt.
That is a purely nonsensical statement (bud)... the funniest thing about it is that you don't even know it.
Hence the reason the USD is one of the most stable currencies in the world, and used as a reserve currency.
It is used as the worlds reserve currency because it is (still - for now) the strongest, yes, but that is only because we used to have rather sane monetary policies - or at least not rabidly insane policies. Up until The Federal Reserve Act at least. It's been all down hill ever since 1933 when FDR stole the people's money (gold), then Johnson stole our silver when they debased the coinage (which was a death penalty offense until about 10 years before they did that, guess they didn't want to take any chances in case the people woke up to what they were doing) - but keeping us on the international gold standard (for foreign nations the dollar was still redeemable in gold until '73) kept the dollar relatively strong to that point. Yeah, it took a while to get where we are now, on the verge of hyper-inflation.
bud...
originally posted by: rounda
If there's no backing asset, you're not devaluing the currency against anything, bud...
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
If there's no backing asset, you're not devaluing the currency against anything, bud...
You're devaluing it against anything and everything that you can buy with it... bud...
More money chaing the same amount of goods = prices go up.
I'm sorry this is so difficult for you to understand. bud.
originally posted by: rounda
in reply tooriginally posted by: tanstaafl
The $5 bill in your pocket will always pay the same $5 in taxes to the federal government, regardless of whether or not it buys you less milk.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
in reply tooriginally posted by: tanstaafl
The $5 bill in your pocket will always pay the same $5 in taxes to the federal government, regardless of whether or not it buys you less milk.
Will it?
Pain... too bad for you deliberate ignorance causes the kind of pain there is no cure for...
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
in reply to: tanstaafl
Yes, it will.
I note that you have no argument...
Ignorance is bliss.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: tanstaafl
5 is 50% of 10
10... what? Lemons?
If those 10 lemons are half the size of the lemons you got last year, then you are getting much less lemons for your $5.
Etc, etc...
-yawn=
Wake me up when you stop saying dumb things...
originally posted by: rounda
$5 pays $5 in federal taxes regardless of how many lemons you can buy.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rounda
$5 pays $5 in federal taxes regardless of how many lemons you can buy.
You sure are fond of taxes.
Yeah, so, your inflated $5 pays $5 worth of a much higher tax bill - higher, because... inflation.
Period.
originally posted by: rounda
If you make $50k/year, and next year the dollar is worth less, based on the same tax rate, /quote]
I find it hilarious that you don't understand that the tax rates will go up.. because... inflation.
But its really not hilarious, it is simply proof that you actually don't understand... inflation...
Tah-tah...
originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: tanstaafl
Except they don't change tax rates every year. The adjust income levels and deductions. The rates stay the same unless there is legislation that changes them, like in 2017.
Where is it going?
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
They absolutely will crack down on it. Most of the things they do to restrict freedom and access won't be observable to Joe Public. It's the same as the Internet.
A Fed-backed digital dollar would then provide many of the benefits touted by cryptocurrencies without their wild price swings and usage fees. In theory, a CBDC would meld the best aspects of physical and digital currencies for the average American.
A CBDC likely wouldn't feel all that different from a regular dollar. People already use digital cash when they shop with credit or debit cards, but in those situations, the currency is backed by private-sector banks. Should the Fed introduce a CBDC, Americans would be able to shop with a digital dollar backed by the country's central bank. If that sounds outlandish, it shouldn't; physical dollar bills are already backed by the Fed, not by commercial banks. Source