I could explain to you exactly what grey aliens are ...
But you'd need a high-degree of understanding of "complex nonlinear dynamics"
You need to understand the cyclical mechanics of time. Relative, but not limited to, how it is perceived linearly
If not, you wouldn't believe it, even if I could explain it to you so you could understand
It is easier just to say, they are extra-dimensional manifestations of the physical containers of soul and "self", within this world
They are people. Just not in the forms that you would know them in this world
And not in a form that those people would be aware exist, or could be said responsible for
The best way to describe it, that nobody will likely understand, is that they are a type of "Birth(ing) trauma"
The manifestations are not what you think they are
They are not nefarious. They are incidental
Similarly, many people believe that places like "Area 51" are places for holding of particular technology, or things to do with aliens. But this is
not the case
Area 51 is what it is, because of (the focus point of) where it is located. Relative to past, and future cycles
It is to do with creating a cyclic constant and precedence, for retrospective acuity, in perpetuity
Think of it like this:
Imagine in the future, you create a type of technology that allows you to send things backwards across time. Or communicate across time
Where would you send this, to ensure that it was received by the people you want it to be received by?
How can you be sure that it wouldn't end up reappearing somewhere, where it would be stuck inside a tree, or a cliff, or a building of a past
You create a place for perpetuity, under very strict guidelines, away from any possible impediments, past or future, secure and secluded
If you were to do this correctly, with the aim of your future self, assisting your past selves?
Then technically, all you would need to do is create the past point. And wait for your future selves to make contact
You have created something that will be a certainty into the long-distant future. That will be a project priority for many years to come with all the
Mathematically, it would mean that if such advances ever come to be possible, you would be the point of reference and contact for such things
"51" means portal or gateway
Pine Gap in Australia is another version
They are very specifically chosen because of their location
There is a big problem with this theory though. A reason why it will never work
They are discounting something called "The Mutual Imperative"
"The Mutual Imperative" means, that if you are to create such a project based on complex nonlinear dynamics, in a linear perspective, you need to also
be certain of inclusion of the imperative
This means those who would be capable to creating such technology
If you don't have the right people included in the project, it will never work
It is far more divergent than even this though
If the project is done in such a way that it is exclusive of the common imperative, then you are far more likely to propagate exclusion in the
imperative, than you are to aggregate it in precipitation
Meaning, that if the person who would understand and develop such technologies "first" before everyone else, doesn't know about the program, isn't
involved with the program, or simply doesn't trust those like the U.S.A Government and Military?
The project will never work
They would know by now if the project has failed or not, simply by the level of contact and interaction with them, from those attending focus points
like Area 51
If they are simply "Observing" them. Coming though and having a look at them, with little-to-no contact?
Then the project has failed. Someone else is in control of the technology in future. Someone who does not trust them
The funny part is, that they are doing it to themselves through the secrecy attached to such understandings
If they were open and transparent with what it was they doing, with the public, it would encourage generations of people from all across the world, to
want to come and work on the project
By keeping it secret, they are ensuring they cut off the very thing they need to make it work
The very process they employ to ensure they succeed, is/will be the very process that will/is ensure/ensuring they will/have/are fail/failed/failing
edit on 27 10 21 by Compendium because: Added something to the end as a very specific hint, for clarity