It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko
Did anyone force most of those women to have sex?
Most? Even some is unacceptable.
Did anyone forced any of the men who may be affected by such a law as in the OP to have sex?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Klassified
I think the leftists should lead by example.
Have them all line up and place their scrotums on a table.
*Takes out a ball peen hammer*
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: underpass61
Gee, don't know. Are they doing their best to take care of those kids? I mean the traditional roles was mom stay home and take care of house, raise kids, ect.
While dad went out into the world and work to provide for them.
So, are the daddies doing their part? Actually providing enough money to provide for her and the kids? Or is she out the trying to take on the dads role while collecting HUD vouchers and food stamps?
originally posted by: Chalcedony
a reply to: Klassified
There is already a precedent for this. Jacobson v. Massachusetts was cited by the Supreme Court in 1927 as justification for involuntary sterilization in the case of Buck v. Bell.
The Court found that the law served the public health and welfare because “mental defectives” would produce degenerate criminal offspring or imbeciles who “sap the strength of the state.” In a chilling opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluded:
"Society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 US 11. Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
Jacobson was cited as support for the general principle that public welfare was sufficient to justify involuntary sterilization. The decision extended the police power’s reach from imposing a monetary penalty for refusing vaccination to forcing surgery on a young woman against her will and depriving her of the ability to have children.
Go Jacobson. Coming up all over the place. Vaccine mandates and now sterilization. Gotta love it and yes I did see this coming the second they started trying to use that case to justify mandates.