It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anonentity
Firstly there is no such thing as free, You get free internet use only because they are mining for information, with regards to the vaccine it's free because you have signed up for a trial. Which may or may not be a benefit in the long term. The long term effects will be from the data in the long term, like all the other past max vaccinations. Which let's face it haven't been that reassuring have they?
First human trials was about 7 years ago, and they did decades of animal trials before that...
originally posted by: oddnutz
Did those trials involve the spike protein produced by the mrna in the covid19 vaccine?
Were there animal trials for the covid19 vaccine?
originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: Xtrozero
First human trials was about 7 years ago, and they did decades of animal trials before that...
Did those trials involve the spike protein produced by the mrna in the covid19 vaccine?
Were there animal trials for the covid19 vaccine?
Human trials 7 years ago and decades of animals studies yet not one approved treatment involving mrna and nano lipids before the emergency use authorisation granted for the covid19 version?
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: sirlancelot
So let me get this straight, you think this information is propaganda because it doesn't meet your non-expert opinion on an effective sample size? You do realize that is exactly the stance the anti-vaccination crowd takes right?
So are you saying the anecdotal and small study reports the anti-vaccination crowd references is also propaganda?
Maybe practice what you preach, mr.180 IQ? You always put “an” before a word with a vowel, which isn’t necessarily always true, for what it’s worth.
originally posted by: TheMirrorSelf
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: TheMirrorSelf
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: seedofchucky
Interesting little piece from Yale
The variability of a statistic is determined by the spread of its sampling distribution. In general, larger samples will have smaller variability. This is because as the sample size increases, the chance of observing extreme values decreases and the observed values for the statistic will group more closely around the mean of the sampling distribution. Furthermore, if the population size is significantly larger than the sample size, then the size of the population will not affect the variability of the sampling distribution (i.e., a sample of size 100 from a population of size 100,000 will have the same variability as a sample of size 100 from a population of size 1,000,000).
Link
Would you agree or disagree?
I would disagree. By that logic the most accurate studies would have a sample size of 1.
Lol, I laugh at you.
Never ceases to amaze me how fortunate we are to have so many big brain, 180+ IQ people on these boards.
I then challenge you to provide me with a academically accepted statically model that should have been used and why it is more accurate. I will wait.
Ummmm...no.
Quick edit: I do have a 180 IQ and graduated top in my class from West Point with a degree in Economics. Just sayin'...
originally posted by: Dr UAE
dont let that jab or what ever that is you took, saline or be it real, control your mind, keep that open mind of yours, fight the narrative, find the truth, it will never find you.