Midazolam (execution drug) stock piled and used during Covide-19 pandemic (end of life protocol UK)

originally posted by: djz3ro
Look out people, I was at a Covid Testing centre last week and they had velvet ropes to mark where to que. Well we all know that rope has been used for executions.

Maybe they're hanging people who test positive for Covid.

No proof yet!

(Psst Doc, Did I do it right?)

No, you fail. You forgot to post a shonky Bitchute source.

Get with the program.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Read your source better.

Midazolam is stated as the first drug used in a 2 or 3 drug protocol

What does the first drug do in those protocols?

It is a sedative but it will hasten death in a few ways. That we so far know of in the UK. It (Midazolam) can be life threatening. Lead to respiratory depression.

In the 1st post of the thread (second link). Half way through the video. Goes into all the details of the Euthanasia.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Midazolam is a Benzodiazepine commonly used for anaesthesia, sedation, sleep walking, and severe agitation.

It works by inducing sleep, decreasing anxiety, and causing a loss of your ability to create new memories.

Quite simply its like a super Valium, and one of many Benzodiazepine drugs used by our NHS to treat a variety of different issues.

I read a very long article about this drug a few days ago, which did raise a few questions as to why, when the NHS have been cancelling many procedures, where this drug may have been used, do they then start stockpiling and scouting out supplies of it.

Anyhoos, that aside, one other issue came to mind from a conversation with my elderly mother (now 79) about 3 months ago.

She decided that if she should succumb to medical issues - heart problems, asthma and type-2 diabetes - she would like to just go, rather than be brought back suffering in a hospital or care home or in a vegetative state, and so contacted her local GP surgery to ask for a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form to sign. After calling the surgery she was informed that a GP would call her back later in the day.

So, a couple of hours later, she received a call from a GP, not her regular GP, but one that she had never even heard of before (she has been a regular at this surgery for several years).
After telling the GP that she wanted a DNR form to sign, that's when things got a little weird.
The GP then went straight into what she said sounded like a practiced routine, leading the conversation with "are you just tired of it all" and "do you feel like you have just had enough".
Needless to say, my mother was quite shocked and told me it sounded like the GP was leading up to euthanasia and a friendly visit with a big bag of drugs! She stopped the GP in her tracks and stated why she wanted the DNR form and that she certainly was not ready to go just yet. Despite the failing body (old age) her mind is still sharp as a tack!

Having got that out of the way and getting the DNR form request back on track, she was than informed that they didn't need to send her one to sign and that the GP could sign it instead, without any consultation with family members. It duly arrived in the post, signed by the GP and no other signature required.
Another family member, having served until fairly recently with the Ambulance Service, stated he had seen many DNR forms before but not anything like this, so the government / NHS had obviously changed the rules at some point recently.

Of course, it doesn't point to a concerted effort to off all oldies, but certainly is food for thought and an old cynic like me does kinda sit up and take notice of such things!

a reply to: Britguy

GP surgeries do have a lot of locum GPs filling in at the moment though it's best to speak to the regular GP and can understand her hesitations concerns with it being a new person asking that line of questioning.

As part of safeguarding GPs and Health Professionals are duty bound to ask that line of questioning from a script to ensure the patient has made a well thought out reasonable decision and it isn't mental health/illness or a quality of life issue causing them to opt for DNR.

There's been a huge scandal in the pandemic where 70% of people hospitalised with covid had DNR orders but were brought back or put on ventilators against their will.

Something did change last year, especially where people with learning disabilities were concerned, where DNR's were completed by GPs without the family knowlege/consent despite them holding legal power of attourney/advocate for the patient. I think 'social distanting' was used as the excuse why the families weren't informed which is a scapregoat for saving money.

A learning disability care provider said it has received an “unprecedented” number of do not resuscitate forms from doctors that it believes to be illegal.

Turning Point, which provides supported living and residential care for people with learning disabilities, has raised concerns to HSJ that it has received 13 “unlawful” do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation or do not resuscitate orders from hospital specialists and GPs since the beginning of April, half of which came in the last week.

Unprecedented number of DNRs given to persons with learning disabilities

Do-not-resuscitate orders were wrongly allocated to some care home residents during the Covid-19 pandemic, causing potentially avoidable deaths, the first phase of a review by England’s Care Quality Commission has found.

The regulator warned that some of the “inappropriate” do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) notices applied in the spring may still be in place and called on all care providers to check with the person concerned that they consent.

These included reports of all the residents of one care home being given a DNACPR notice, and of the notices routinely being applied to anyone infected with Covid.

Some people reported that they did not even know a DNACPR order had been placed on their relative until they were quite unwell.

May be worth contacting CQC or a relevant charity about the DNR as it's already been ordered to stop by CQC twice and they would be interested for their own investigations.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The most dangerous vaccines of all time ….

Based on what? The vaccination process for Covid followed all the steps and procedures required, testing was done. NONE of them inject 5G antennas, nanochips or any other nonsense like that.

So what makes these the most dangerous of all time?

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Why do you say it’s an execution drug when it’s not?

It’s used as a sedative, not for killing.

Because you're wrong. Why don't you look it up first before making false claims?????

MIDAZOLAM: Seven states have used midazolam as the first drug in the three-drug protocol: Florida, Ohio, Oklahoma, Alabama, Virginia, Arkansas, and Tennessee. Oklahoma used midazolam in the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in April 2014, and Lockett died after the procedure was halted. Alabama’s use of midazolam in the execution of Ronald Smith in December 2016, resulted in nearly fifteen minutes of Smith heaving and gasping for breath.

MIDAZOLAM: Seven states have used midazolam as the first drug

So what you're saying is it's a sedative that they use within the execution process, it's a sedative, not one of the lethal drugs.

Stop moving the goalposts to fit your narrative.

In this case context is important. This is a perfectly ordinary drug with many common uses which was being stockpiled just in case there were supply problems caused by Brexit

And while thus drug is used during executions its purpose is to ensure that the processes is less traumatic rather than to outright kill.

What David ike is doing is the equivalent of saying that people buying 0lastic water bottles in antisipation of the water being cut off due to maintenance is a sign that BLM is going to burn a town down on the grounds that you can also make fire bombs with bottles.