New York school gives students a surprise course on pornography literacy

‘Pornography Literacy: An intersectional focus on mainstream porn’ was a course given to 120 male and female students (some in person, others by Zoom) and, according to the New York Post, was taught by Justine Ang Fonte, the Health & Wellness director at New York’s Dalton, who says on her website that she has “reveled in disrupting health education for 10 years.”

The presentation . . . included images of partially nude women (some in bondage), discussions on the “orgasm gaps” between straight and gay women, and popular search terms on pornographic websites like “stepmom” and “anal,” as well as ‘genres’ of porn such as “barely legal.”

Another section included a lesson on “the marketability of OnlyFans,” an increasingly popular subscription service where people, mainly females, offer suggestive or pornographic photos and videos for fees.

parents requested materials from the ‘porn literacy’ lesson from administrators, but were denied.

www.rt.com...

120 students at Columbia Grammar & Preparatory School were treated to a surprise "porn literacy" course by teacher Justine Ang Fonte, who openly admits on her personal website that she "revels in disrupting health education". Contents of the course included different types of pornography such as bondage (including photos), as well as different genres and search terms that students could use to look up pornographic content - "stepmom", "anal", "barely legal", etc. This teacher then went a step further and taught the class about "the marketability of OnlyFans", which is a website that is used (mainly by females) to upload pornographic photos and videos of themselves for money.
Outraged parents requested the materials that had been used in the course. The school refused to provide them.

This disgusting pervert who openly admits she loves "disrupting health education" needs to be fired and arrested for corruption of minors. She wasn't simply teaching a sex education class, she was showing fetish pornography to minors, teaching them how to look up pornography, and encouraging them to sell their bodies online.

This woman has bigger balls than most men in the education industry. I approve.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
This woman has bigger balls than most men in the education industry. I approve.

Yeah ok, I guess you'd be alright with someone encouraging your minor daughter to sell pornographic photos and videos of herself while showing her all the different genres.

a reply to: trollz

Society is done, man.

Soon one of our leftie empty brains will be by to tell us that “it’s just the normal now; society always changes and new things become normal that were once not normal.” One of our members pulled that stupid logic in a thread a few days ago.

That’s how we’ve gotten to “Oh yeah, there is no biological difference between men and women.”. Etc.

Disgusting.

P.s.
I think Duckduckgo has become compromised. I’ve noticed it hiding things from search results recently- it’s basically as bad as google now.

originally posted by: trollz

originally posted by: TzarChasm
This woman has bigger balls than most men in the education industry. I approve.

Yeah ok, I guess you'd be alright with someone encouraging your minor daughter to sell pornographic photos and videos of herself while showing her all the different genres.

No one is being "encouraged" to participate in virtual prostitution. They are being informed what it's about and what it means for human sexuality and the female culture in particular.

So we definitely shouldn't teach children about anything ethically questionable in school or they might grow up painfully ignorant of what bad decisions look like and how those consequences affect them in long term, nor do they understand how to rationally work their way through decision making opportunities that let them express biological urges in a healthy fashion that doesn't scar them with self loathing and repressed sexuality for the rest of their lives. Because that's how education works apparently.

a reply to: trollz

Are you sending your kids to this $55K+ a year tuition private school?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Are you sending your kids to this $55K+ a year tuition private school?

"Not my money, not my concern" isn't an argument.

originally posted by: trollz
"Not my money, not my concern" isn't an argument.

No? It is for the mind your own business crowd. If the parents paying for this have a problem they can take their own recourse to deal with it.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Are you missing the point? The PARENTS at said school are angry that this was slipped into the curriculum. Noting that it is a pricey school to send kids to, rather interesting the school did this. People complain about the public school's and what gets taught without the parents consent. Now parents at a private school are dealing with that very same issue. It is worth noting that despite the "merits" some see in teaching this, the subject matter is not something that you should be just able to drop into a classroom.

The presentation, some of which was seen by the Post, included images of partially nude women (some in bondage), discussions on the “orgasm gaps” between straight and gay women, and popular search terms on pornographic websites like “stepmom” and “anal,” as well as ‘genres’ of porn such as “barely legal.”

HMM, popular search terms for porn, how many of those terms are necessary for educational purposes? Remember these are minors we are talking about.

originally posted by: hangedman13
The PARENTS at said school are angry that this was slipped into the curriculum.

Are you missing the point? It's for them to deal with, like I said. This is just the next outrage du jour. Come back tomorrow for a new thing that has nothing to do with you that will get you wound up.

That damn woman is taking the place of everyone's strange uncle.
Some things should be left to family to introduce to children.

Seriously though this is a direct assault on the innocence of children.
They don't need help getting warped with Hollywood in the state it is in.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Rather ironic or moronic of you not sure which. Maybe I am worked up over nothing but this tells me maybe I'm picking a correct topic to be riled up over.

‘Pornography Literacy: An intersectional focus on mainstream porn’ was a course given to 120 male and female students (some in person, others by Zoom) and, according to the New York Post, was taught by Justine Ang Fonte, the Health & Wellness director at New York’s Dalton, who says on her website that she has “reveled in disrupting health education for 10 years.”

SO if her stated goal is disruption, maybe just maybe it is something to be concerned with. Silence is consent for this issue. That is not a statement from an educator, that is a statement of intent.

originally posted by: hangedman13
Silence is consent for this issue.

Oh, good on you then for getting outraged online. Besides that what's your big plan?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: hangedman13
Silence is consent for this issue.

Oh, good on you then for getting outraged online. Besides that what's your big plan?

Obviously a Facebook post, online petition, GoFundMe and then something Snapchat related until Twitter praises open sexuality as a key element of teen education and ultimately forces it as a standard practice in nationwide curriculum because keeping it in the bedroom is so 1800s and progressive culture demands acceptance of human sexuality in the public where everyone can be happy and proud of who they are and who they do it with.

Or something like that.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: trollz

originally posted by: TzarChasm
This woman has bigger balls than most men in the education industry. I approve.

Yeah ok, I guess you'd be alright with someone encouraging your minor daughter to sell pornographic photos and videos of herself while showing her all the different genres.

No one is being "encouraged" to participate in virtual prostitution. They are being informed what it's about and what it means for human sexuality and the female culture in particular.

So we definitely shouldn't teach children about anything ethically questionable in school or they might grow up painfully ignorant of what bad decisions look like and how those consequences affect them in long term, nor do they understand how to rationally work their way through decision making opportunities that let them express biological urges in a healthy fashion that doesn't scar them with self loathing and repressed sexuality for the rest of their lives. Because that's how education works apparently.

I understand and appreciate your argument. The problem is this:

parents requested materials from the ‘porn literacy’ lesson from administrators, but were denied.

If the school is to embarrassed or ashamed to share their coriculum with the community they themselves clearly feel they have crossed the line.

If they feel strongly about their coriculum and its benefits they wouldn't mind taking out a front page ad in the local paper explaining exactly what they are doing.

What most likely happened here was the one individual took it upon themselves to expand the coriculum with out input from anyone else ... and thats always wrong when it comes to teaching minor children no matter what the subject matter is.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
This woman has bigger balls than most men in the education industry. I approve.

Edited. You are part of the problem.

If anything they should be teaching Tantra and simultaneous orgasms.

Sheesh.

When your other classmates watched porn before age 12, or early, or a friend from a foreign country parents are ok with it, or parents couldn't use the internet like their kids.

Point A goes to Point B, and not point C, an ether pray something does or doesn't come out sometime later.

when i think back to my schooldays, we were embarrassed at the mere mention of anything sex-related (i attended a boys-only grammar school). our reproductive biology classes mainly consisted of dissecting first worms, then rats (which we raised ourselves, then gassed) and being told what the various innards were for, as if this somehow related to human sexual interaction. was this a better system than such as that in the OP? i don't know.

a reply to: trollz

Now we know why we can't have AP math anymore. Funding went to porn.