It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anonentity
I was cruising through the web and came across an interesting snippet regarding Idi Amin the late Dictator of Uganda, he had his army train Chimps to use machetes on his enemies, the fact that the Chimps are now training younger Chimps to use the weapon seems to have gone unnoticed. When you see that an Elephant can draw quite well there is a deeper and more meaningful conclusion to what seems to be more than just a novelty therein in for Human entertainment. Then I came across this Gem where some West African soldiers give a Chimp an AK 47 for a laugh until it backfires no pun intended.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Humans can't stop treating each other like total garbage so this seems like a really tall order.
I do support arming the apes though. Better to get on their good side I reckon.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Edumakated
I think you should reconsider the term "rudimentary", and instead maybe offer "different".
We compare intelligence to our own. Im not sure this is apt. We have a set of skills that are unique to begin with. And it created a worldview that is similarly unique. But an animal that is able to survive int he wild surely must have an intelligence that many humans lack, as we would often struggle without training.
Which speaks to there being a par level somewhere in there, where you can wash away skills and look at pure capability. But even with that...the only reason humans rate so high is because all measurements are done using a human as a measuring device. We don't measure intelligence in absolutes. We measure it relative to us, which causes us to miss out on so much that, while we may not find it useful given our skillset, still would be meaningful to the creature that possesses it.
In this vein, im a big fan of the Multiple Intelligences theory. This acknowledges that the measurement of intelligence is mostly subjective, but gives some objective parameters which to measure it within. Its all still a measurement scale worked out around human ability, but it at least gives some nod to notions of spatial intelligenice (which most raptors would wipe the floor with us in) or kinesthetic intelligence (which a dolphin would likely excel in).