Finally! Forensic Election Audit in Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week

a reply to: xuenchen

That's interesting, considering the entire impetus that gave a Raison D'Etre to the Arizona audit was Trump and his "massive election fraud" claims, and since so many here seem to be considering this audit a "win", it's comical that the energy that created it, ended up seeing that he lost more than originally thought.

That's some win LOL

a reply to: alphabetaone

That red pill is gonna hurt.

Not what the audit found at all.



On top of 17,000 duplicates.

That all counted.

a reply to: alphabetaone

"Prosecuting" fraud is hard sometimes especially when "laws" get broken but there's no way to "Prosecute" 🤫

a reply to: xuenchen

Won't be able to prosecute everyone.

But AG has the goods on some.

And Senate has the goods to decertify for democrat election fraud.

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
a reply to: xuenchen

Won't be able to prosecute everyone.

But AG has the goods on some.

And Senate has the goods to decertify for democrat election fraud.

Hope it happens !!!🙂

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
a reply to: xuenchen

Won't be able to prosecute everyone.

But AG has the goods on some.

And Senate has the goods to decertify for democrat election fraud.

Hope it happens !!!🙂

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: xuenchen

That's interesting, considering the entire impetus that gave a Raison D'Etre to the Arizona audit was Trump and his "massive election fraud" claims, and since so many here seem to be considering this audit a "win", it's comical that the energy that created it, ended up seeing that he lost more than originally thought.

That's some win LOL

Everything you said is pretty much wrong on every level. This may be gaslighting on a massive level... or this may be all that your mind was capable of grasping of the situation. I don't know.

But you only speak for yourself, your perception, and at least you've been consistent.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: alphabetaone

"Prosecuting" fraud is hard sometimes especially when "laws" get broken but there's no way to "Prosecute" 🤫

Not arguing... but "fraud" is a very specific crime with a very specific legal definition, and may or may not be a factor here.

But fraud is not the only crime the guilty need to worry about. In fact, depending on specific findings in other states, they may need to worry more about RICO.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: alphabetaone

"Prosecuting" fraud is hard sometimes especially when "laws" get broken but there's no way to "Prosecute" 🤫

I cant quite make out the segue of that, to what i find interesting.

a reply to: Boadicea

Nope.

You're wrong, im right.

Numbers arent a "perception" or an "opinion".

a reply to: alphabetaone

They sure aren't.

Here's some numbers for you.




In addition to 17,000 duplicates that also got counted.

Lame try.

Trump had nothing to do with the "impetus" that brought about the audit in Arizona. That impetus was the people of Arizona and their own personal experiences as well as what they heard and read from fellow Arizonans. It began before the election. It ramped up big time on Election Day and immediately after. And it was compounded and magnified with the testimony of our fellow Arizonans at the initial Senate hearing.

Nor was it ever intended to do anything except identify strengths and weaknesses -- both in theory and in practice -- to inform and inspire future election reform. Anything and everything that came about indirectly was a byproduct, not the purpose.

The fact that you -- and plenty of others -- cannot get over Trump or past Trump or beyond Trump is not our problem. That is your perception...delusion... obsession... whatever. You speak for yourself, not us.

a reply to: Boadicea

Sorry. You're wrong. Deal with it and move on. You're pathetic at this point.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Boadicea

Sorry. You're wrong. Deal with it and move on. You're pathetic at this point.

AlphaBetaOne, after you grow up, you'll better understand how the world operates, and will (hopefully) regret being mean to adults who are attempting to help you.

a reply to: alphabetaone

So you just realized what the audit found?

Trying to defend that certainly IS pathetic.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Boadicea

Sorry. You're wrong. Deal with it and move on. You're pathetic at this point.

I wish I were wrong. I wish the audit hadn't found any invalid ballots, hadn't found any invalid voters, hadn't found any cheating election workers/officials, hadn't found anything questionable at all. I wish that the audit had shown a clean and fair election. I wish that we could just accept the outcome and put it all behind us. I really do. Because that's what would be best for our state and our nation and the whole world.

I don't understand why you would rather attack me and the others in this thread than the lying liars and cheating cheaters that corrupted our election. But it doesn't matter. Your conscience is for you to tend... my conscience is for me to tend. We know the truth. You know it. I know it. It is what it is, and my conscience is clear. I'm good with that.

And that's $2 more for Wendy Rogers...

originally posted by: Boadicea
I wish the audit hadn't found any invalid ballots...

What the audit found was that the invalid won by a few votes more.


Sorry, you teed that up for me.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Boadicea
I wish the audit hadn't found any invalid ballots...

What the audit found was that the invalid won by a few votes more.


Sorry, you teed that up for me.

so the Cyber Ninjas did good and validated your beliefs. That's a wonderful thing. But did they also find any discrepancies, or was this the "most secure election in the history of man", or were the Cyber Ninjas just a bunch of hacks?

It's all so confusing when the lies start to emerge.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

What the audit found was that the invalid won by a few votes more.


Sorry, you teed that up for me.

Yeah, I sure did...

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Boadicea

Sorry. You're wrong. Deal with it and move on. You're pathetic at this point.

Wasn't the point of this whole thing to do a deep look at the election process and report the findings? If so, didn't that just happen? Isn't that exactly what Boadicea has been saying?