It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: xpoq47
That particle fetishism is what's in the way of true understanding.
Kind of absurd to believe forces work via clumps.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: xpoq47
That particle fetishism is what's in the way of true understanding.
Kind of absurd to believe forces work via clumps.
Then there is the problem of creation by obervation. We have known since the early 20th century that our observation changes reality, and it has been proven many times after that, e.g. see this article. It may well be that our intent, our research into small particles actually creates new ones, ad infinitum... so, perhaps by merely discussing this, setting up experiments - nature itself is changed. Which makes perfect sense to me, as we humans are built of the same particles that once were in the same soup and hence entangled.
I also wonder what the speed of gravitation waves / particles would be. Or, in other words, if I were able to switch off the gravitational field of earth, would that be noticable only after 20 years on a planet 20 light years away - or would it be instant? Gravitation may well be faster than light, it may be related to the same effect that creates entanglement: a direct "spooky distant action" So, by building a gravitational transmitter / receiver (one that creates fluctuations in the gravitational field), would we be able to communicate faster than light?
I wonder why you post this in here, I dont' think many will understand what you wrote, with due respect to those that do. Let's see where this goes..
I think you're confusing gravitation with space-time? Because gravity doesn't go very far, it's like Einstein thought just a property of the fabric.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: xpoq47
That particle fetishism is what's in the way of true understanding.
Kind of absurd to believe forces work via clumps.
Then there is the problem of creation by obervation. We have known since the early 20th century that our observation changes reality, and it has been proven many times after that, e.g. see this article. It may well be that our intent, our research into small particles actually creates new ones, ad infinitum... so, perhaps by merely discussing this, setting up experiments - nature itself is changed. Which makes perfect sense to me, as we humans are built of the same particles that once were in the same soup and hence entangled.
I also wonder what the speed of gravitation waves / particles would be. Or, in other words, if I were able to switch off the gravitational field of earth, would that be noticable only after 20 years on a planet 20 light years away - or would it be instant? Gravitation may well be faster than light, it may be related to the same effect that creates entanglement: a direct "spooky distant action" So, by building a gravitational transmitter / receiver (one that creates fluctuations in the gravitational field), would we be able to communicate faster than light?
I wonder why you post this in here, I dont' think many will understand what you wrote, with due respect to those that do. Let's see where this goes..
Gravitational waves have been detected. They travel at light speed.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Matter is composed of a standing wave of energy reflected back on itself.
Reflected by what?
It's like I catch a ball (particle) and throw it back... how does that move me in the opposite direction the forces occur?
Texttraveling at lightspeed squared. They would mediate Einstein’s lightspeed limit but certainly not be subject to it.
The important point is that a ball coming from the opposite direction to cancel out your nudge on the bottle has to pass through the Earth and have slightly reduced chance of canceling your effect, leaving you at a slight advantage. Billions of g created by incoming gravinos are opposed by billions minus 1 from the opposite side of the Earth, leaving net gravity of 1 g. I explained that at the beginning of this thread.
The squared is geometrical and rotational.