It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why must y’all always bring cheetoh Jesus into this stuff. This was a perfectly decent thread until your hated spray tan God was brought up in our pristine CT-discussing sandbox
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Kurokage
People who haven't had a thorough mental exam should not be allowed to have access to the internet. PERIOD.
Says a Trump chatbot.
originally posted by: slatesteam
Why must y’all always bring cheetoh Jesus into this stuff. This was a perfectly decent thread until your hated spray tan God was brought up in our pristine CT-discussing sandbox
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Kurokage
People who haven't had a thorough mental exam should not be allowed to have access to the internet. PERIOD.
Says a Trump chatbot.
originally posted by: TXRabbit
It used to be....people who prefer to think for themselves could be considered "conspiracy theorists", at least among the other CT circles.
Now, it's a strawman used by anyone trying to build or push a specific narrative. In this case, TPTB could use this term to blanket-label ANYONE who questions the vaccine, it's safety or it's effectiveness.
The "sheeple" out there regard the term "conspiracy theorist" in a negative context and immediately view someone labeled as such one who isn't stable, believes in crazy things and can snap at any moment. They've been conditioned to FEAR the person labeled with that term.
FEAR = CONTROL
Joe #wad and Mary Dip# out there now have a decision to make when considering the vaccine. Do I want to be labeled a CT if I have questions or do I want to be a good little square and take it, no questions asked
originally posted by: bluesjr
I think we should all just redefine what happens on sites like these by calling ourselves Corruption Investigators. It seems like it would be hard to make that a negative. Though after the past several years, who knows.
Isn’t Truther taken already? And yeah I do agree with you. My point being slander knows no boundary against inquisitive and curious minds....
originally posted by: TXRabbit
originally posted by: bluesjr
I think we should all just redefine what happens on sites like these by calling ourselves Corruption Investigators. It seems like it would be hard to make that a negative. Though after the past several years, who knows.
I prefer the term "truth seekers"
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: TerryDon79
The media used it for a specific reason though, which is the whole point.
Just forget about it if you can't understand.