It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
I welcome this news, and can't wait to start reading about the upcoming Indian, Iranian, Russian and Chinese versions that will be touted as even more advanced.
What would all these countries do without the good-old U.S.A.
[edit on 3/16/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
That's really all I've seen you do on ATS.
John E. Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a nongovernmental defense think tank, said yesterday that the Falcon and CAV programs will allow the United States "to crush someone anywhere in world on 30 minutes' notice with no need for a nearby air base."
Originally posted by Gazrok
Seems like this would be like dropping a 1 million dollar bomb to blow up a mud hut to me, but ok....
Better be some damned target to justify the expense of using this thing. Hell, just reloading it would cost a fortune... Wouldn't an ICBM be quicker and cheaper?
Silenus
I would think that it makes more sense for countries like India and China, not to franticly try catch up with the u.s. (and create deficits etc.) but rather focus on clusters of stratospheric blimps that hold in place your local GPS and antimissile lasers, serve as awacs, comsats etc.
Gazrok
Seems like this would be like dropping a 1 million dollar bomb to blow up a mud hut to me, but ok....
Better be some damned target to justify the expense of using this thing. Hell, just reloading it would cost a fortune... Wouldn't an ICBM be quicker and cheaper?
Originally posted by Murcielago
Are you sure that this is the FALCON/HYPERSOAR craft, sometimes they use the same name for different projects. It has some similarities, like the "anywhere in 2 hours" thing and that it "resembles a space plane", but it still sounds a lot different then the FAL/HYP, like: It says that it will glide, so that means its unpowered.
agh- this article needs more facts, like what is its propulsion system, it says it will go mach 5, wich means it doesn't use a jet engine, it could be rocket or ramjet or scramjet or PDE. Wasn't the Hypersoar/FALCON a scramjet? In which case if this is the same vehicle they why go only mach 5, when you could at least triple that speed? This is a confusing article, through-out the article it says that they can strike anywhere in the world in 2 hours, but then in the 4th to last paragraph it says "crush someone anywhere in world on 30 minutes' notice", ahhhh- where did the other hour in a half go?
Gazrok
Seems like this would be like dropping a 1 million dollar bomb to blow up a mud hut to me, but ok....
Better be some damned target to justify the expense of using this thing. Hell, just reloading it would cost a fortune... Wouldn't an ICBM be quicker and cheaper?
A manned version has already been built and is operational.
Originally posted by Qwas
I'm sorry but I see nothing but new problems with this project.
First, I seem to recall a treaty signed by the US stating space is to be used for peaceful purposes only. So wouldn't this project be in defiance of that treaty?
Second, I see a start to future space wars. Other countries will have to come with a defense to this weapon. How long until civilian satellites get damaged by these space wars. And then we have to launch more rockets and spend millions more to replace bad satellites.
Third, there are other treaties that keep our military presence on foreign soils. So how could this project close down those bases?