It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Hanslune
Dead link.
Dammit, sounds good. As we speak I can gaze at an offshore island (Kapapa) which is the remnant of a coral reef. A result of sea level subsidence.
Spent a number of overnighters out there as a teenager. Much safer than driving around Honolulu.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FishBait
That's weird. The link in your quote works but the one in the post you replied to does not.
The sample from Pine Island dates to 118,000 years ago but that date is considered unreliable.
The age of the coral from the Isle of Pines is unreliable because it has been recrystallized by as much as 30%, and it was the only sample dated from this site
I wonder what recrystallization of coral might entail.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Hanslune
Ancient coral heads could fit.
But there are clusters of these things at pretty high elevations (100+ meters). Accounting for the iron oxide is also problematic if the presumption is that these are uplifted reefs.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: FishBait
I think I've seen this before.
This is a photo from OP's link of a Tumuli field full of mounds.
Here is the excavation diagram's.
Here is a theory on how they were built.
And here is what comes to mind.
This is HAARP.
And what was built, may have been a huge antenna field, used to send a specific frequency.
Maybe, maybe not.
This is a photo from OP's link of a Tumuli field full of mounds.
Figure 7A, 7B (2 images): A view showing so-called “mima-like mounds” and a graphic illustrating two hypothesized erosion scenarios resulting in the formation of mima-like mounds. Graphic kindly provided by Nathalie Diaz, University of Lausanne.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
This is a photo from OP's link of a Tumuli field full of mounds.
No it isn't. It's a photo from Cameroon.
Figure 7A, 7B (2 images): A view showing so-called “mima-like mounds” and a graphic illustrating two hypothesized erosion scenarios resulting in the formation of mima-like mounds. Graphic kindly provided by Nathalie Diaz, University of Lausanne.
And you don't see a visible shaft here either, correct?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
I'm not convinced that the concrete is artificial.
I'm not convinced that the iron oxide nodules are in any more of a circular pattern than the core is regular. From all appearances, there are probably nodules throughout the core.
I'm not convinced there is a "purpose."