It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Current coronavirus tally may represent only 6% of total infections
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It’s all well and good if you or your loved ones are not at high risk. The likelihood being that you will get through okay, no effects, no struggling to breath, no drowning in your own thick mucus.
Unfortunately, not everyone is so fortunate, and if I lose one loved one as a result of government negligence, then that would be unforgivable.
But hey oh, capitalism is worth saving over and beyond any person right?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
I've been noticing that the UK (and Europe, in general) appears to have a much more tragic death rate than the US. It's so much higher that I can't help but think the strains circulating there are more deadly.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It’s all well and good if you or your loved ones are not at high risk. The likelihood being that you will get through okay, no effects, no struggling to breath, no drowning in your own thick mucus.
Unfortunately, not everyone is so fortunate, and if I lose one loved one as a result of government negligence, then that would be unforgivable.
But hey oh, capitalism is worth saving over and beyond any person right?
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
What about all of us that lost loved ones from the opioid epidemic? Why didn’t the whole world shut down to help those people or the many lost loved ones from cancer. Shutting down the world for any crisis is just dumb and if you lose a loved ones due to one then it’s unfortunate but also life.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It’s all well and good if you or your loved ones are not at high risk. The likelihood being that you will get through okay, no effects, no struggling to breath, no drowning in your own thick mucus.
Unfortunately, not everyone is so fortunate, and if I lose one loved one as a result of government negligence, then that would be unforgivable.
But hey oh, capitalism is worth saving over and beyond any person right?
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
If they are at so much risk, would it not be in their best interest to be proactive and keep themselves secluded and apart from other people anyway? Do they not worry about the flu? I mean, come on now.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Do you and yours cower in your homes daily? Risks are everywhere, man. You ever seen how many people die in car accidents? What about slip and falls getting out of a shower or bath be careful out there!
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It’s all well and good if you or your loved ones are not at high risk. The likelihood being that you will get through okay, no effects, no struggling to breath, no drowning in your own thick mucus.
Unfortunately, not everyone is so fortunate, and if I lose one loved one as a result of government negligence, then that would be unforgivable.
But hey oh, capitalism is worth saving over and beyond any person right?
Considering how many people would die during a depression, yep... Capitalism is worth saving over and beyond any person.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Do you and yours cower in your homes daily? Risks are everywhere, man. You ever seen how many people die in car accidents? What about slip and falls getting out of a shower or bath be careful out there!
No, not under normal circumstances, but to be honest it’s none of your God damn business.