It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Well let's be honest here.
Many colleges are actually football stadium with schools attached.....
originally posted by: hyperlexic
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: hyperlexic
Because they knew what they were getting when they signed on. Playing for 4 years at Stanford would pay off $310,280 in your schooling. Everyone else who is working through college will be paying that back for a long long time. This is another can of worms that will kill college football as we know it.
When the sport dies, "It sounded like a good idea at the time" isn't going to bring it back...
It will never ruin the sport . There is more than enough money to go around. They are handing out 100 million dollar contracts like candy in the NFL and it hasnt ruined that league at all.
The rich guys swore it would ruin it though if they had to share.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Bluntone22
Very stupid. Only California would make a move this stupid. They'll be in violation of NCAA rules and not allowed to play in any bowl games once this takes effect. I'm 99.9% sure every game they play in the regular season will be forfeited as well.
You said not to bring up the scholarship, but that's tens of thousands of dollars PER semester that's paid for. That should be more than enough.
So should an engineering student who is also on a scholarship be prevented from taking paid internships or working part time?
Getting a scholarship for Engineering is different than a scholarship in football. Paying the players is too easy to take for granted and take advantage of. For that reason, I don't see an issue with it.
Not only that, but most of their time is spent practicing, would they have a chance to even hold a job?
If most of their time is spent practicing, then why are they even in school? In other words, they really aren't "student" athletes... just athletes that happen to play for a University.
I spent practically every waking hour studying. I barely had time for anything.
Schools already try to one up each other with the non-financial incentives so I don't really see how allowing the athletes to earn money would result in an unlevel playing field any different than it is now.
originally posted by: namehere
california probably just ruined their entire college sports future with this move because paying their players won't be profitable enough to be sustainable for most schools.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: namehere
california probably just ruined their entire college sports future with this move because paying their players won't be profitable enough to be sustainable for most schools.
Hur-dur, I didn't read the article.
California is not paying their athletes, they're allowing them rightly to go out and earn money from their brand on endorsements.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
The money made (and there is a vast amount being made) is going to fund scholarships. Not just athletic scholarships, but academic and need-based scholarships. The money that so many seem to want pulled from the schools is the reason many kids get to go to college in the first place. People need to understand that.
So, the short answer of where it all goes is that Michigan’s football revenue (along with surpluses from men’s basketball, men’s ice hockey and men’s lacrosse) goes to support two dozen other teams and nearly 650 other student athletes. Source
If you start paying college players, they might not be trying as hard anymore.
Lazy players get left behind.