It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: Grambler
Amen!
I wonder just how long the people will wait before a mass outcry.
The sleeping giant is awakening and people are seeing what's going on.
In the last minute joe goes on about how all of these people broke the law but Barr probably won’t charge anyone cause he just wants the info public and to restore people’s faith
In the last minute joe goes on about how all of these people broke the law but Barr probably won’t charge anyone cause he just wants the info public and to restore people’s faith
originally posted by: charolais
Ummm, so where is this IG ruling? Or are you just posting a he said she said from an interview?
Pretty misleading / fake news'ish.
For the record, I can report that the Inspector General has found that all four FISA warrants were illegal.
originally posted by: charolais
Ummm, so where is this IG ruling? Or are you just posting a he said she said from an interview?
Pretty misleading / fake news'ish.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: charolais
Ummm, so where is this IG ruling? Or are you just posting a he said she said from an interview?
Pretty misleading / fake news'ish.
For the record, I can report that the Inspector General has found that all four FISA warrants were illegal.
This is from an actual person with a name, not the CNN version of "two people who were close to the source of someone who once worked somewhere heard from an unnamed source that..."
Sounds a lot more promising then what we are usually given.
We'll see, shall we?
U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin
Michael IsikoffChief Investigative Correspondent•September 24, 2016
Lol, oh? This is a discussion and sources are at play. However, we'll see what the IG says, but it isn't looking good for you people, at all.
originally posted by: Duderino
originally posted by: charolais
Ummm, so where is this IG ruling? Or are you just posting a he said she said from an interview?
Pretty misleading / fake news'ish.
Shhh, there isn't one. You have to let them let some steam off once in a while, it's been hard work defending Trump's erratic and crazy week.
The proof of this is a youtube video and there are no press releases from any real attorneys. Digenova is a retired attorney in his 70s, who was a federal attorney in the 1980s and has since been a conspiracy theorist. As a conspiracy theorist, he is known in this community but is in no way credible.
Furthermore, he made this claim in May, so this is hardly breaking news. It's breaking if breaking means 'within last 4 months'.
Anyways, shhh, just go along with it.
Via Benjamin Wittes:
Let me translate this paragraph for you: Such meetings generally take place when indictment is imminent; they happen when the government plans to bring charges. You should thus expect charges against McCabe to be forthcoming any day. And if such charges don’t happen, that doesn’t mean they weren’t planned but, rather, that some extrinsic event has intervened.
originally posted by: Duderino
originally posted by: charolais
Ummm, so where is this IG ruling? Or are you just posting a he said she said from an interview?
Pretty misleading / fake news'ish.
Shhh, there isn't one. You have to let them let some steam off once in a while, it's been hard work defending Trump's erratic and crazy week.
The proof of this is a youtube video and there are no press releases from any real attorneys. Digenova is a retired attorney in his 70s, who was a federal attorney in the 1980s and has since been a conspiracy theorist. As a conspiracy theorist, he is known in this community but is in no way credible.
Furthermore, he made this claim in May, so this is hardly breaking news. It's breaking if breaking means 'within last 4 months'.
Anyways, shhh, just go along with it.
originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: Duderino
Speaking of fantasy land. Keep telling yourself that.
Joe is a regular on FOX, if he makes such an emphatic statement as he made "For the record I can report"... and is incorrect he's done. And he knows it. He's an attorney and understands Libel.
originally posted by: Duderino
I love this website, you guys crack me up.
originally posted by: CIAGypsy
How much you want to bet that somehow, some way McCabe, Strozk, Comey, all of them, will somehow walk as well? This kind of corruption does NOT happen in a vacuum.