It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
The 14th Amendment:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. "
An infant in ventre sa mere, or in the mother's womb, is supposed in law to be born for many purposes.
You do realize at the time a baby in the womb was considered born right?
William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) set forth themes that have contributed to several current American laws. His influence on the institution of law in America was profound. The morals and values inherent in the Commentaries are a major part of
Blackstone’s appeal to Americans and a reason why the Commentaries became the major resource for American statutory and case law for more than a century after the Constitution was written.
A fetus is not a person under New York law or under the State and Federal Constitutions. (United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62; Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N Y 2d 478; Kelly v. Gregory, 282 App. Div. 542; Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397; Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309; Adickes v. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144; Steinberg v. Brown, 321 F. Supp. 741; Rosen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Med. Examiners
……….
A fetus is not a "person" pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments which provide that no "person" shall be deprived of life without due process. (People v. Fein, 292 N. Y. 10; Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N Y 2d 478; Woods v. Lancet, 303 N. Y. 349; Kelly v. Gregory, 282 App. Div. 542; Matter of Peabody, 5 N Y 2d 541; People v. Belous, 71 Cal. 2d 954, 397 U.S. 915; Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479
……...
. Whether a fetus is a "human being" and a "person" to be afforded a constitutional protection is a question of law and not fact, and no court, as a matter of law, has declared the fetus a person under the Constitution. (Rosen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 318 F. Supp. 1217; United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62
………….
The occasions of State intervention extending benefit or protection to the fetus provide no support for the contention that the fetus has any constitutional rights. (People v. McGonegal, 136 N. Y. 62; Evans v. People, 49 N. Y. 86; Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250; Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535; Matter of Sampson, 29 N Y 2d 900; Application of President & Directors of Georgetown Coll., 331 F. 2d 1000, 377 U.S. 978; Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N Y 2d 478; Kelly v. Gregory, 282 App. Div. 542
originally posted by: dawnstar
I still think they should be able to apply for disability benefits as soon as its known the fetus has has a disabling birth defect. Think they should speed up the process and do away with the waiting period also. Have Medicare card and disability checks all set up to go as soon as birth and disability is confirmed by Dr's. It might reassure some to know that they will have that help as they are listening to all the possible things that might be wrong, all the surgeries that might be needed and there would be less smoke coming out their ears as they try
to guesstimate just how far into debt they will end up being if they roll the dice and end up being unlucky. It might actually reduce the number of late term abortions.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: loam
What about disability benefits?
I did not realize 1972 was when the Constitution was written. When the Constitution was written, a child in the womb was considered a born person.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JAGStorm
Only if the fetus gets a Social Security number.
Yes that is what I'm asking. Should a fetus get a ss#.....It is a person right?
originally posted by: BiffWellington
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JAGStorm
Only if the fetus gets a Social Security number.
Yes that is what I'm asking. Should a fetus get a ss#.....It is a person right?
Not according to the US Constitution.
"No fetus shall get a social security number."
Which amendment was that again?