It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
What justice did Trump obstruct?
Simple question.
Anyone have the stones to provide a simple damned answer???
originally posted by: Rewey
originally posted by: DBCowboy
What justice did Trump obstruct?
Simple question.
Anyone have the stones to provide a simple damned answer???
That's an easy one. He asked the head of his cyber security division to 'stand down' in his investigation into the Russian interference he had discovered. This was obstruction according to the legal definition, as it hampered a legitimate and active investigation. It proves conclusively that Trump didn't want the Russian meddling investigated or stopped.
Wait a sec... Am I confusing Trump with someone else???
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Cassi3l
So, to summarize what's happening here, Nadler and the House Dems are trying to make the argument that Trump asking about the legality and wisdom of various possible actions, which are within his authority as POTUS, constituted "obstruction." Hmmm... so seeking legal counsel from the White House legal counsel is a crime now? LMAO!!!!
Wow. Seriously? They're wasting our time now with *this?*
It's over, let it go.
ETA: I now believe that President Trump seriously and significantly overestimated his foes. He needn't waste one more second on this Keystone Cops meet the Three Stooges Act some in DC are intent on continuing the stage presence of. Ignore them into oblivion and this will burn itself out before the end of Summer.
originally posted by: Rewey
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: burdman30ott6
They are ensuring Trump's 2nd term.
At this point, Trump should make a tweet suggesting the repeal of the 22nd amendment to allow a president more than two terms. Just to watch the Democrat heads explode. Just for a laugh...