It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: strongfp
The US has been sending money for decades.
It hasn't helped. It just lined the pockets of those in power.
I say cut funding until they do get their own countries in order.
I say cut funding to every country that negatively impacts the US.
your example is not valid at all.
Israel respects US.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Mach2
I corrected my math.
Taking in immigrants isnt going to solve their problems. The problems need to be solved where they come from.
And yes, it is less than 200 million for the nations hes targeting. It's more to 180m.
I dont understand why his focus is to dismantle any sort of progress for south and central America, what is the fixation? Closing borders, stopping aid, pointing blame, what good is coming from this?
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Mach2
You honestly think someone just cuts a check and hands it to someone? It goes to aid organizations.
Why not help them instead of scolding them? Send advisors. It also doesnt help that large criminal organizations run rampant everywhere.
I understand what people are getting at, but this is not a step towards progress this is a step towards chaos. Just another knotch on the destabilization plan the US Gov. Has in store for that part of the planet.
Find it funny how people are so worried over 200m. Yet gladly will hand over tens of billions worth of arms and aid to isreal.
We all live on the same rock , it isn't the peoples fault they don't live in a land of milk and honey.
originally posted by: Mach2
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: Mach2
originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: gortex
Look man, I know you just want to help poor people in other countries but we can't afford that right now. There is a lot of poor people right here that needs to be attended first, like those homeless veterans.
Just out of curiosity, why do you single out veterans, when you make that statement? Are they, somehow, more deserving than any other homeless person?
I agree that we have more problems, than money, and we certainly don't need to import more. Just trying to assess why you put that qualifier in there.
Maybe like me he is a vet. Maybe he also supports wounded and disable veterans organizations. I do.
I assumed that he was a vet.
My question was, should veterans get preferential treatment as it pertains to dealing with the homeless situation? There are homeless women and children as well.
I'm not anti veteren, military, or anything like that. I was interested in the point of view that he had, not knocking it.