It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Let's wait and see if he's directly quoting me :-)
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
I sense a bigly amount of hypocrisy....
Just imagine what would happen to a brown person at a trump rally wanting her children back.
Think she would be allowed to speak?
Is that how you view them? "Brown people"?
Yeah, just like I see white people as white people. like me....you got a problem with that amigo?
The people I associate with are brown people that call themselves "Mexicans" even though they were born in Oklahoma. What's your deal man?
I just don't like racism.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Taking it one step further - do you believe people should be protected from heckling?
You simply said no one has the rigbht to be hegard, and that you support the right to peaceful protest so its clear what you mean when asked if heckelers should be allowed tyo shut people down.
No we know your game.
You simply said no one has the rigbht to be hegard, and that you support the right to peaceful protest so its clear what you mean when asked if heckelers should be allowed tyo shut people down.
Then when everyone with any reason assumes that means ok, you are syaing becvause the hecklers arent violent, and because the soeaker does not have the right to be heard, that means you support the hecklers right to shut down speakers.
Then you say oh no, thats not at all what you meant.
Provoing as I have said this whole thread, you seek only to be vague and obsfucate your position because you know you cant defend it.
Will you clearly asnwer the questiopn yet, or again continue to be vague.
Should hecklers be allowed to shout and scream so speakers or teachers cant be heard?
Stop acting like other people interpreting your vague answers in the most common sense way are somehow doing you an injustice.
You had the choice to clearly state your opinion, but chose not to.
The reason is you know you cant defend it, which is why you are now backing down saying you dont support the rights for some to silence others.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Grambler
You simply said no one has the rigbht to be hegard, and that you support the right to peaceful protest so its clear what you mean when asked if heckelers should be allowed tyo shut people down.
What I said is that I believe people have the right to peaceful protest
I don't believe anyone should be guaranteed a platform
Do you disagree with this?
If you wonder why I don't engage more often - it's because you aren't honorable. Play nice - or don't bother
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Spiramirabilis
No, excuse me, but that is exactly what you said.
You stated that heckling is an acceptable form of protest. Heckling is using the loudest voices to silence the majority.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
I sense a bigly amount of hypocrisy....
Just imagine what would happen to a brown person at a trump rally wanting her children back.
Think she would be allowed to speak?
Is that how you view them? "Brown people"?
Yeah, just like I see white people as white people. like me....you got a problem with that amigo?
The people I associate with are brown people that call themselves "Mexicans" even though they were born in Oklahoma. What's your deal man?
I just don't like racism.
Do you think I'm racist for seeing racial and cultural differences. Here in the Rio Grande valley is the most tolerant area in the US with, Indians, gringos, Mexicans, blacks all getting along fantastic until some dumb ass yankee or cracker stirs the pot.
Here's the thing though, conservatives wouldn't bother. It's their right to talk let 'em have it. We are not afflicted by the chronic insecurity that consumes the left. "Sticks and stones" you know.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
Taking it one step further - do you believe people should be protected from heckling?
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Grambler
I believe in the right to peaceful protest.
Why dont you?
See how you are?
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: olaru12
I sense a bigly amount of hypocrisy....
Just imagine what would happen to a brown person at a trump rally wanting her children back.
Think she would be allowed to speak?
Is that how you view them? "Brown people"?
Yeah, just like I see white people as white people. like me....you got a problem with that amigo?
The people I associate with are brown people that call themselves "Mexicans" even though they were born in Oklahoma. What's your deal man?
I just don't like racism.
Do you think I'm racist for seeing racial and cultural differences. Here in the Rio Grande valley is the most tolerant area in the US with, Indians, gringos, Mexicans, blacks all getting along fantastic until some dumb ass yankee or cracker stirs the pot.
from Grambler: Should protestors be allowed to heckle speakers so that they may not speak and people cant hear them?
originally posted by: AScrubWhoDied
Yes. Free speech. Speakers better speak up.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: underpass61
When I said (earlier in the thread) that sometimes the illegal thing is the moral thing? This is what I'm talking about. Riots in the freaking streets if necessary
If - necessary. It's not necessary. Yet
No, but I also don't believe hecklers should be protected from consequences which may include getting their asses beat down if they're dumb enough to heckle someone in the midst of a crowd of their target's supporters. Speech has consequences, ya?
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
Always with the violence Burd. Always - with the violence
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: burdman30ott6
No, but I also don't believe hecklers should be protected from consequences which may include getting their asses beat down if they're dumb enough to heckle someone in the midst of a crowd of their target's supporters. Speech has consequences, ya?
Always with the violence Burd. Always - with the violence
But hecklers? They are the real problem
Your point? I'm not telling anyone to whip another's ass, I'm simply saying those whose asses get whipped often should have foreseen it coming long before it happened.