Conspiracy against Trump from within the White House - Story from an active Resistance insider?

The op-ed was unusually published as an anonymous submission by the New York Times, which described the author as “a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure”.

Given the amount of firings, resignations, indictments
the dearth of posts still waiting to be filled
how many 'senior officials' are left ?

Even 'funnier' for ATS'ers :Corsi has been supoenad by Mueller

a reply to: burntheships

Locker room talk ?
Classy

Wow, but I feel like saying, "who didn't know that"?

And this, folks, is the reason Kelly, Maddox, Sessions, and others haven't resigned, and why they deny comments attributed to them in Woodward's book. They remain to continue to try and keep our country out of peril.

originally posted by: angeldoll
Wow, but I feel like saying, "who didn't know that"?

And this, folks, is the reason Kelly, Maddox, Sessions, and others haven't resigned. They remain to continue to try and keep our country out of peril.

Yed many of us did know that the deep state was real and was actively trying to sabotage trump.

It was the people who dislike trump that said this wasnt true.,

Now those same people say of course its true, and its a good thing.

Let's see...her name was Ali Watkins.

DOJ seized her records all the way back to her naive college days.

Ali Watkins in connection with an investigation into alleged leaks of information regarding the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's (SSCI) probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. The metadata, from Watkins' Verizon and Google accounts, spanned years, dating back to when she was a college student. Watkins was informed of the seizure in a letter from the Justice Department.

The records were seized as evidence in the case of James Wolfe, former director of security for the SSCI, who is alleged to have leaked classified information provided by the government to the committee to Watkins and other reporters. Wolfe's indictment alleges that Watkins and Wolfe had a romantic relationship dating back to 2013, when Watkins was a college student and intern with a news organization in Washington. Watkins worked at Buzzfeed and Politico before join

arstechnica.com...

My guess is she is still under surveillance.

But she probably has some like minded coworkers...

And to think there was money involved, for shame, traitors.

She was accusing Trumps own administration officials
in her twitter feed, when it was really her.

a reply to: burntheships

i guess we will see some day. who the # cares what they look like. Does someones face determine their credibility to you?

a reply to: Fowlerstoad

This is like Q ANON but for everyone who isn't a Trump supporter!

LMAOOO!!! HILARIOUS!

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: angeldoll
Wow, but I feel like saying, "who didn't know that"?

And this, folks, is the reason Kelly, Maddox, Sessions, and others haven't resigned. They remain to continue to try and keep our country out of peril.

Yed many of us did know that the deep state was real and was actively trying to sabotage trump.

It was the people who dislike trump that said this wasnt true.,

Now those same people say of course its true, and its a good thing.

Good God. They are not the deep state, there is no stupid deep state, and the article states clearly they are not the idiotic 'deep state'. The NYT's knows the identity of the writer. If you read it you would realize that.

a reply to: Grambler

I seriously doubt they will agree when that same stain acts against an admin of their choosing. I will not agree either, this is the most damaging information to ever be confirmed about our Democracy or lack of. I would be equally as outraged if a Democrat President was similarly treated

originally posted by: Fowlerstoad
There have been lots of rumors on multiple fronts about a conspiracy within the Whitehouse itself, to thwart the Trump administration, and all that they stand for.

Now, there is an admission of guilt from an insider, posted in no other less reputable place than the prestigious New York Times :


www.nytimes.com...

They give an unusual reason (according even to their own internal policy) which they decide to justify with the following statement:

"The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process..."

So, this is an anonymous essay, in which the NYT believes in enough to publish against their policy.

Perhaps this sheds a lot of light into multiple situations, concerning operations within the Whitehouse, and within the press simultaneously.

I recommend this as a 'must read'.

Last gasp from a crumbling establishment
..!. .!..

a reply to: Sillyolme

She was a liar, and got caught.

Who cares what she looks like?

However, when one commits crimes like that, they can
expect a bit of fame, no?

"Treason?"

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: angeldoll
Wow, but I feel like saying, "who didn't know that"?

And this, folks, is the reason Kelly, Maddox, Sessions, and others haven't resigned. They remain to continue to try and keep our country out of peril.

Yed many of us did know that the deep state was real and was actively trying to sabotage trump.

It was the people who dislike trump that said this wasnt true.,

Now those same people say of course its true, and its a good thing.

Good God. They are not the deep state, there is no stupid deep state, and the article states clearly they are not the idiotic 'deep state'. The NYT's knows the identity of the writer. If you read it you would realize that.

"Hi. We are unelected officials that are secretly working to sabotage trumps presidency. We couldnt get him kicked out of office using the 25th amendment, so we have since been trying to stymie his policies well pretending to be working for him.

Oh dont call us DEEP STATE though, we prefer STEADY STATE"

a reply to: Grambler

Meh. Believe what you will. As Melania so ungraciously put it "I really don't care".

Well, you can't blame the Democrats for this one. This is an inside person, someone likely appointed by Trump.

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Grambler

I seriously doubt they will agree when that same stain acts against an admin of their choosing. I will not agree either, this is the most damaging information to ever be confirmed about our Democracy or lack of. I would be equally as outraged if a Democrat President was similarly treated

Agreed.

And lets not be mistaken, this isnt a whistleblower. This isnt someone saying there are crimes being committed, and he is telling the proper authorities or media to stop them. That would be fine.

This is someone who claims trump is amoral, that he has sunk all of us with this amorality, and he (or she) and their cohorts are staging a coup inside the administration because they subjectively find trump immoral and dont like his policies.

And yet people cheer for this, oblivious to the fact that this sae tactic will be used against people they like on the otehr side.

Ask bernie.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: angeldoll
Wow, but I feel like saying, "who didn't know that"?

And this, folks, is the reason Kelly, Maddox, Sessions, and others haven't resigned. They remain to continue to try and keep our country out of peril.

Yed many of us did know that the deep state was real and was actively trying to sabotage trump.

It was the people who dislike trump that said this wasnt true.,

Now those same people say of course its true, and its a good thing.

Now resorting to the Alex Jones narrative? Good luck with that.

a reply t=o: olaru12

trump and his fall from grace

"Trump" + "grace" in the same phrase ...!?!
nooooooooo

Love 'n' marriage
horse 'n' carriage
bacon 'n' eggs
arsenic and old ladies

Some things are just waiting to be matched up

Trump + perp walk
would be a prime-time t.v moment

Think about this.

Look how low the NYT has sunk.

The D.C. established Swamp and Big Media have had a cushy playground for a long long time and their incestuous relationship is well known. They are not happy that The American People elected an outsider to clean up the mess.

They are pulling out their old Big Guns and resorting to Anonymous Sources to smear our duly elected president and regain their power and swampy playground. Effem. I don't buy this article for one second.

Shame on the NYT, but it is what we have come to expect.

Fake News Media is the Enemy.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Grambler

I seriously doubt they will agree when that same stain acts against an admin of their choosing. I will not agree either, this is the most damaging information to ever be confirmed about our Democracy or lack of. I would be equally as outraged if a Democrat President was similarly treated

Agreed.

And lets not be mistaken, this isnt a whistleblower. This isnt someone saying there are crimes being committed, and he is telling the proper authorities or media to stop them. That would be fine.

This is someone who claims trump is amoral, that he has sunk all of us with this amorality, and he (or she) and their cohorts are staging a coup inside the administration because they subjectively find trump immoral and dont like his policies.

And yet people cheer for this, oblivious to the fact that this sae tactic will be used against people they like on the otehr side.

Ask bernie.

Well posted