It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
Has anyone mentioned the obvious wings flapping yet?
Ref: www.abovetopsecret.com...
The last photo of the UFO appears to be in front of the rooftop chimney. How is this possible ?
Now compare these birds pics with the UFO frame captures from 3.28 mark.
wth????
originally posted by: free_spirit
a reply to: anomalie
In my analysis frame by frame in closeup slowmotion
there were not a sign of flapping among the frames
meaning the object presents the same shape without
any change therefore No Flapping, Not a Bird.
I posted the seqience in closeup & slowmotion frame
by frame, check the images. To claim this is a bird
requires graphic evidence to support the claim. Mere
words proves nothing. This object is not a bird., must
be something else.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: anomalie
The last photo of the UFO appears to be in front of the rooftop chimney. How is this possible ?
Cheers for the pics
have you ever walked, driven, stood in front of anything?
Its possible, trust me.
Now compare these birds pics with the UFO frame captures from 3.28 mark.
yes
wth????
The birds were flapping and flying behind the chimney and the later object could easily be another bird gliding in front of the chimney.
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Did anyone notice around the 3:23 mark, something hover from one window to the next before that thing speeds by?
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: fleabit
That's the fastest bird I've ever seen.
originally posted by: free_spirit
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: fleabit
That's the fastest bird I've ever seen.
Also the world's biggest of all time, a true Guinnes Record if I may say,
capable of being identified at that distance from a tv monitor inside a
tv studio, a super bird indeed.
The most surprising thing is that some people claim to see " Flapping "
wich at these instances result a very common "cliche by default" and
without providing any kind of graphic evidence to prove the shape of
the object changes every frame of the footage then "Flapping" result
a common bluff. It's very easy to bluff anybody can bluff. But to prove
something with evidence that is the real challenge. This is a good case
provided by a good source ESPN, the footage is of a very good resolution
to be analyzed. I did my own analysis and posted here the sequences
in closeup without pixelization. The shape of the object is consistent
in every frame in slowmotion. Measuring the distance according to
the perspective the object is certainly big in size.
This is my personal conclusion at this time, still a unidentified object.
Some people are so anxious to solve the case quickly that they recur
to the bluff. Very easy indeed but not a valid argument, not with an
evidence. And the worst bluff is " An extraterrestial ship from another
world" Let' see who is the one to mention the ET option.