It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mark Landler and David Sanger of The New York Times wrote an article arguing there were deep divisions between Trump and his advisors. To support the claim, the Times argued that Trump said a June 12 summit was still possible, while his top aides said it was “impossible”:
"As with so many issues involving this president, the views of his aides often have little effect on what he actually says. On Thursday, for example, a senior White House official told reporters that even if the meeting were reinstated, holding it on June 12 would be impossible, given the lack of time and the amount of planning needed.
On Friday, Mr. Trump said, ‘It could even be the 12th."
President Trump responded by calling it fake news, tweeting:
Trump was incorrect when he said that The New York Times “quotes” the official. They actually characterized his remarks. But they definitely claimed a senior White House official said June 12 was impossible.
Media types rushed to The New York Times’ defense, claiming they heard a White House official say the “impossible” line in a background briefing they were privy to. Someone leaked audio of a background briefing that they said supported The New York Times’ “impossible” characterization.
...
You will note that at no time does the White House official say a June 12 meeting is “impossible,” and at no point does he agree that the “ship sailed” or that time has run out. He definitely says it would be difficult to prepare for the summit given the lack of time to do so
...
Recall that the whole point of their characterization was to say this official was at odds with Trump and that Trump wasn’t listening to his advisors. The fact that Trump and his advisors were not disagreeing with each other undermines the entire point of The New York Times story.
But rather than admit that The New York Times was incorrect, and their reporters aren’t good at listening to Trump advisors or accurately conveying their remarks, the media claimed that Trump was the one lying, since, well, White House advisors who give briefings exist. See, Trump said no source existed who said the June 12 date was impossible — but a source exists who did not say that. Ergo: Trump lied.
I’m sure you see the logical failures here, even if President Trump could have or should have said that The New York Times attributed fake news to a real source.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Grambler
No the Official did not say what was reported but he is in fact a White House Official.
In that regard Trump should have known better and left that part out of his tweet.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Grambler
No the Official did not say what was reported but he is in fact a White House Official.
In that regard Trump should have known better and left that part out of his tweet.
It's crazy that we get worked up over stupid crap like this, whether someone said a certain date or not. Who cares? This is small fries compared to other stuff the media and/or Trump have lied about in the past and just goes to show they've gotten us to the point where well cry about anything and everything no matter how insignificant it is.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: seeker1963
The water I drink is soaked with my constitutional rights and mixed with some Jack for good measure. And yes I am fully prepared I got my drones, guns, food and water purification needs and a whole host of other things.
The media is out of lies and they need something to distract the masses from their shackles......
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963
The media is out of lies and they need something to distract the masses from their shackles......
They've had us distracted for years now, what ever happened with Hillary's emails or Russian collusion? Oh yeah, they're still beating those dead horses after years of us chasing the carrot.