Ok Dems' do you want Communism or not?

originally posted by: CB328

What's the difference between Communism or Capitalism ? The way I see it the rich get richer and the poor stay poorer under both systems.

They are both bad. America was great when it had a mixed economy, now its going too far towards oligarchy and fascism and we will probably be a full blown monarchy within 50 years with no rights or money for 90% of the people.

Only Communism is bad of those two ideals. One Communism is a gov system. Capitalism is financial system that works best when men are free to collaborate on the laws of the land without being taken over like the Uniparty has been taken.

Capitalism is financial system that works best when men are free to collaborate on the laws of the land

But we don't have the freedom to collaborate on our laws usually because their too busy making laws that the corrup capitalists want.

a reply to: Justoneman

In Soviet Union, we knew that under capitalism, man exploits his fellow man, but under communism it is other way round.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Justoneman

In Soviet Union, we knew that under capitalism, man exploits his fellow man, but under communism it is other way round.

Man exploits his fellow man (following logic) = Man exploits his fellow man. I agree. Got to love the Russian humor... Yakov Smirnoff is one fine comedy writing Russian.

Here in the US we wrote the Constitution because power corrupts and absolutely power corrupts ABSOLUTELY. The capitalists have cheated the system and we need to but a check and balance for that soon.

It may be we have the need to do an end around the international bankers to end the cabal like a bitcoin might be to them. Those in absolute control of finances likely will fund a war against any and all who oppose their empire of silver and gold where they loan "Reserve Notes" . Notes that only they get to print and then ask to receive more back than they print creating a strain on the note. Their war against civilization as we wish it, when it comes for us will likely have hints of Josef Stalin, Pol Pot or Mao tactics.

If that happens remember that Gen. Patton said to make the enemy die for their cause. Freedom of all mankind is the most noble cause to defend and requires growing pains to maintain the course.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Justoneman

What's the difference between Communism or Capitalism ?
The way I see it the rich get richer and the poor stay poorer under both systems.

Does Capitalism take from people? No.
Does Capitalism tax people? No.
Does Capitalism tell people what they can and cannot buy? No.

Capitalism is not a political system. Capitalism has helped more people out of poverty than any other economic system in the history of the planet. Capitalism allows people who are willing to take risks to achieve great things.

Yes it does , ever heard of Lassie laissez-faire capitalism?? filled with abuses, reducing folks to slavery or something akin to slavery, read the works of Upton Sinclair and John Steinbeck.

As bad an idea as communism is. there is a reason for it's rise and popularity among vast amount of folks.

a reply to: Justoneman

Their war against civilization as we wish it, when it comes for us will likely have hints of Josef Stalin, Pol Pot or Mao tactics.

Like declaring the free press "an enemy of the people?"

They complain about Hitler and the Nazis so much so that it's on the history exams, and yet Stalin an Mao murdered way more people, and yet I'm only learning about them recently.

If they ever do bring communism, will the food be plain and bland like Cuba's if it became the way?

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Justoneman

What's the difference between Communism or Capitalism?

Capitalism turns your young country into the world superpower in 200 years. Communism has you eating tree bark and grass in 2 decades.

Socialism is the first step to communism, yes this is what Democrats want, they're open about it.

They're lazy people who haven't succeeded in a free market so they want to change.

a reply to: xstealth

And yet, Soviets became a super power in 205 years?

What's the point when ether both systems can lead to the same extreme...the inequal distribution of wealth or authority power in the hands of one or few.

O wait one can dream, while the other can't for its health?

Good old theocratic rule.

originally posted by: Specimen
a reply to: xstealth

And yet, Soviets became a super power in 205 years?

What's the point when ether both systems can lead to the same extreme...the inequal distribution of wealth or authority power in the hands of one or few.

O wait one can dream, while the other can't for its health?

Good old theocratic rule.

The Soviets didn't become a superpower in 205 years with a communist government.

Nothing you're saying is true.

originally posted by: xstealth

originally posted by: Specimen
a reply to: xstealth

And yet, Soviets became a super power in 205 years?

What's the point when ether both systems can lead to the same extreme...the inequal distribution of wealth or authority power in the hands of one or few.

O wait one can dream, while the other can't for its health?

Good old theocratic rule.

The Soviets didn't become a superpower in 205 years with a communist government.

Nothing you're saying is true.

They gave us a run for the money during the Cold War.
It may have turned out differently if we did not use the rest of the world as our piggy bank with the petrodollar.

Why are we so defiant on protecting the petrodollar with the largest global military in the world if capitalism is so great?

originally posted by: jacobe001

originally posted by: xstealth

originally posted by: Specimen
a reply to: xstealth

And yet, Soviets became a super power in 205 years?

What's the point when ether both systems can lead to the same extreme...the inequal distribution of wealth or authority power in the hands of one or few.

O wait one can dream, while the other can't for its health?

Good old theocratic rule.

The Soviets didn't become a superpower in 205 years with a communist government.

Nothing you're saying is true.

They gave us a run for the money during the Cold War.
It may have turned out differently if we did not use the rest of the world as our piggy bank with the petrodollar.

Why are we so defiant on protecting the petrodollar with the largest global military in the world if capitalism is so great?

Read your history or be duped again and again.

Our Scientist gave them the Bomb to keep the US in a stalemate. Capitalism slaughtered the socialist style economy and we easily were eating better, sleeping better and making better tech. They had to capitulate to the Western demand to tear down the wall and let the Iron Curtain states go free again.

originally posted by: jacobe001

originally posted by: xstealth

originally posted by: Specimen
a reply to: xstealth

And yet, Soviets became a super power in 205 years?

What's the point when ether both systems can lead to the same extreme...the inequal distribution of wealth or authority power in the hands of one or few.

O wait one can dream, while the other can't for its health?

Good old theocratic rule.

The Soviets didn't become a superpower in 205 years with a communist government.

Nothing you're saying is true.

They gave us a run for the money during the Cold War.
It may have turned out differently if we did not use the rest of the world as our piggy bank with the petrodollar.

Why are we so defiant on protecting the petrodollar with the largest global military in the world if capitalism is so great?

Antony Sutton wrote a bunch of books on stuff like how Wall
Street funded both the Nazis and the Bolshevik Revolution.

Capitalism is bad, communism is bad, socialism is the middle ground.

originally posted by: CB328
Capitalism is bad, communism is bad, socialism is the middle ground.

I think it is controlled Anarchy that is best. Out of Chaos, we make a bit of Order. The Less Gov is allowed to be controlling our daily lives is proving to be the BEST Gov possible.