It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Washington would have had them shot
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: Grambler
She also says Nunes and Gowdy were able to dig up a name, implying they know who this person is as well.
Interesting, well whomever it is....
I think Nunes will get to the bottom of it. He certainly has the right to
inform the President, if he hasn't already.
It seems you are right about her thinking its a US citizen.
Who on trumps campaign in a US citizen that might be abroad and have ties to foreign intel services?
Does page fit that criteria?
originally posted by: The GUT
If it's Page that explains A LOT. The idea has been tossed around some by those following the details closely.
If these imperious bastards think they are going to get away with this like they are accustomed to getting away with stuff...I think they got another think coming this time.
They better hope it's from honest prosecutors and not a ticked-off public with pitchforks.
Which would lead to another big question for the FBI: When? The bureau has been doggedly sticking with its story that a tip in July 2016 about the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos launched its counterintelligence probe. Still, the players in this affair—the FBI, former Director Jim Comey, the Steele dossier authors—have been suspiciously vague on the key moments leading up to that launch date. When precisely was the Steele dossier delivered to the FBI? When precisely did the Papadopoulos information come in?
And to the point, when precisely was this human source operating? Because if it was prior to that infamous Papadopoulos tip, then the FBI isn’t being straight. It would mean the bureau was spying on the Trump campaign prior to that moment. And that in turn would mean that the FBI had been spurred to act on the basis of something other than a junior campaign aide’s loose lips.
originally posted by: The GUT
Twitter and blogs are blowing up. Folk are pissed like I've never seen before. Me too. This won't stand. My money is on Page.
a reply to: Grambler
Just saw your post above. Maybe it is GP?
originally posted by: olaru12
Trump has been dealing with the Russian mob for years. Perhaps that's why they had an FBI informant and had nothing to do with the campaign.
But why do they even need an informant? Trump can't even stop the leaks from his staff.
www.usnews.com...
thehill.com...
Just speculating...
originally posted by: Grambler
This would be a level of abuse so egregious that it would be unheard of.
The repercussions of this would be astounding. The threshold for the FBI to have a human spy in a Presidential campaign should have to be so extremely high that it would be almost impossible. I cant even imagine a scenario when this should happen.
originally posted by: burntheships
I was also thinking of George Papadopoulos, however
he has plead guilty to lying to the FBI, Has he been sentenced?
originally posted by: xuenchen
A ball buster would be if Manafort is the Mole.
😎
Source: theconservativetreehouse.com... nated-brennans-ec/
Chairman Nunes sent Main Justice a classified letter asking questions. DOJ responded saying they would NOT comply with providing information (letter) The Washington Post claimed Nunes was looking for information on an FBI/DOJ ‘source’: “a U.S. citizen who has provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI.” Additionally, this “source” was later also described by WaPo as a witness for Robert Mueller’s ongoing investigation.